Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM:Thank you. Any other questions from the Commissioners? <br />Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:In going over the material that we have, a significant concern I have is <br />regarding the community, the effect that this project has had so far in terms of the community. <br />And I commend that it looks like, what I can see, there were like five meetings from November <br />through March with the community and the applicants. The community association in particular <br />is asking for further meetings and trying to work out whatever the residual concerns that they <br />have. And under our Rules, we are working under a 90-day deadline basically that started back <br />in the beginning of April when we first were presented with this application. Our <br />Rule 11-3 (b) (2) allows for a longer time for the Commission to consider this matter as long as <br />the applicant agrees to additional time. So my question to the applicants is whether you would <br />agree to extend the 90-day time for the Commission to consider this matter, so that you can go <br />backtothecommunitytohavefurthermeetingsandtrytoworkitout,sotherecanbeaunified-. <br />If you work it out, my hope is that you come back and there will be a consensus in the <br />community. Or at least the association and so forth would come back and say, okay, this is how <br />we like, you know, we are all happy now, and go ahead and let this project go through. <br />INOUYE:Commissioner Iwashita, we would be happy to do that if we felt that <br />somewhere along the line that a compromised solution was available. Unfortunately, our view is <br />nothing short of withdrawing our application right now would satisfy those that have opposed <br />our project. So we may as well figure out now whether we want to go forward or not. And if <br />not, then well just go on our way. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Mr. Inouye. <br />IWASHITA:Mr. Chair? Just a follow-up. <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Iwashita, follow-up? <br />IWASHITA:Yeah. I appreciate your frank response, Mr. Inouye. You know, my view <br />is we have our responsibility. And our, you know, what powers limited in this case that we have <br />to do, I really view planning, and that power is given to us under the Codes, the laws that are in <br />effect here. But I really believe that in reading in particular the community associations request, <br />I dont see that thats on the record, if you will, that there has been a totally exhaustive effort <br />done in terms of trying to work it out with the community. And this is a significant, as I see it, <br />multi-million dollar project that is being proposed, and it will have a long-term effect and <br />probably a precedential effect in the community, in this rural community. So I really believe that <br />the community -, any developer, not just this applicant, should make a, what I will term, <br />complete and total effort to address the community concerns, go to the community and do the <br />best in trying to work that out. And my humble opinion now is that further time can be used to <br />address these concerns. So I strongly suggest that we have more time to deal with this. That <br />doesnt require a response. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Commissioner Iwashita. Do you wish to make a comment, <br />Mr. Inouye? <br />9EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />