My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-04 TPITTULO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-04 TPITTULO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:17:36 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:17:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Thank you. Other questions from Commissioners? Mr. Yuen, I had a <br />question maybe you could help me with. Generally we act on rezoning applications with a lot of <br />attention paid to the General Plan, whether it conforms or not. And I think on these two <br />applications we have here this afternoon they both conform, so theres no fault to be found with <br />them in that regard. However, we do have sort of a substantial portion of green land here which, <br />you know, can be urbanized. And given the General Plan designation there are a lot of different <br />urbanizations possible. Like these two here we have today are different. So Im just thinking, <br />we do have individual property owners and individual property owners have their own plans that <br />they like and what they like to do with their property, but, you know, there is some way that <br />youd like the whole package to come up with some kind of conformity that sticks together and <br />works as a unit. Does the Planning Department really have any way to deal with that concern? <br />Could you just speak to that, please. <br />YUEN:We dont have a master plan for Ponahawai Street. And the difficulty <br />withPonahawaiStreetisthatitwassubdividedintoone-acrelots.Sothismeansthattheyhavea <br />variety of owners, some of whom see their future as a multi-family, and some see it as a <br />commercial; and thats what youre seeing. To give you a contrary example of trying to send a <br />direction in the General Plan, in the General Plan revisions last time, you know, Waiakea House <br />Lots is where a similar thing happened in a way because you took, there was an area that was <br />previously Low Density Urban in the General Plan and then put into Medium Density. All right? <br />And then it opens the door for a lot of decisions which can be made by a particular landowner <br />and then decided on at the rezoning stage on a case-by-case basis like were doing here by the <br />Planning Commission and by the County Council. That was starting to feel a little haphazard in <br />the Waiakea House Lots; and so we proposed a text amendment to the General Plan which <br />suggested that Commercial rezonings should take place along certain streets, Manono Street, <br />Lanikaula Street, which are the major streets for the movement of traffic and that along the side <br />streets like Laukapu Street, Hinano Street, the General Plan is encouraging Residential <br />rezonings. So you would have the Residential rezonings more on the interior. So thats an <br />example of trying to send a direction. But we havent done that for Ponahawai Street, and yes <br />we have been just seeing a series of applications. <br />And if these are passed and they developed according to the application, what youre going to <br />see are a mixed group of some commercial and typically office type buildings and a few <br />relatively small apartment buildings. Its unfortunate, and to tell you the truth, the property was <br />subdivided according to an Ag-1 zoning. There was a tentative subdivision approval when we <br />came in, my administration came into the Planning Department. I knew this was exactly what <br />was going to happen, but it did have tentative subdivision approval and was approved with the <br />one-acre lots. And when I say thats whats going to happen, that once you start, you know, its <br />a lot easier to master plan an area or to have a coordinated development of an area when you <br />have one owner who has 5, 10, 15, 20 acres and they can create something. And typically from <br />both a planning and an aesthetic point of view youll have a better area when you have an area <br />where somebody owns 10 acres and they come in and -. If we had one owner come in with 10 <br />acres wed probably wind up a more, almost certainly will wind up with a better plan and more <br />coordinated area; but thats simply not what we have. <br />GRAHAM:Yeah, thank you. It seems to me like maybe this is sort of a situation <br />where the community development plan process can be helpful if the community wants to push a <br />3EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.