Laserfiche WebLink
In this particular situation, the nature of the project is such that you don€t have the supporters, the <br />usual supporters that would come out for like an affordable housing or housing project,‚ <br />because they€re not here. Unlike, you know, if you have a request for like a Charter School or a <br />church or whatever, you have the members like coming up and you have a lot of supporters in <br />that regards as opposed to like a housing project. But you do have neighbors who express <br />concerns and you try to arrive at hopefully like a win-win situation; but you€re kind of like, it€s <br />very difficult. <br />The other one is that, you know, I just noted that of the two testifiers I€m somewhat indirectly <br />related to them. Mr. Hirano is my wife€s cousin and he spoke for it. Vicky Abe is my wife€s, <br />it€s all on my wife€s side, my wife€s sister€s in-law. And so I know them personally; and I€ve <br />got a job to do. <br />But having said that, I think that in listening to the substantive type of comments, you know, like <br />there€stheissueabouttheGeneralPlan,Imean,youknow,itwasinMediumDensity,itwent <br />down back to Low Density, and then back again up to Medium Density. But make no mistake <br />about it, this property is on the Medium Density side. It€s the Abe-Saito side that€s in the <br />Industrial area. But not withstanding that, you know, from the General Plan standpoint, it€s <br />Medium Density. And as I was indicating earlier, you know, it€s like calling for like a mixed <br />type of use. You know, the question, however, is like as what Mr. Nekoba was pointing out, like <br />maybe apartments should be or multiple family units should all be confined in one area; and he <br />mentioned like that, you know, to Puueo. But when you think about it, like, well, is this where <br />you want, like have all the apartments all confined to one area like in Puueo, or for that matter on <br />the Hoolulu Park side of the Houselots area, or do you want to have more like a mixture of use? <br />And, you know, I€ve traveled, I have been fortunate enough to travel; and I€ve gone to Japan like <br />a number of times. And I find it so interesting that community because you have a mixture of <br />uses, and they all get along. You have high rises, you have single family homes, and you have <br />multiple family homes, you have commercial, you have industrial; and they all function as a <br />community. And I think that€s what I think is the intent behind the mixed zoning kind of <br />concept; and you have a Medium Density that provides you with that kind of an opportunity to, <br />you know, to capitalize on that kind of an opportunity. <br />True, you know, there are some substantive issues. As I mentioned earlier, like from the density <br />perspective Mr. Mochida could do a 6-lot subdivision, and do 12 units on the property, and not <br />paying an impact fee, not doing an affordable housing, you know that kind of stuff. But it <br />doesn€t foster a true sense of community within that area. I mean that€s kind of like from his <br />perspective which I also share too. There are some environmental or infrastructure kind of <br />questions like, you know, on the traffic. And, true, there are discussions about like, you know, if <br />you look at the parking situation and apartments down at the Hoolulu Park end and most of those <br />apartments were constructed prior to the current Zoning Code that we have, so everybody was <br />just kind of doing the minimum, one stall for each apartment unit. What the Planning <br />Department is suggesting here, which we agree, you know, given the car culture that we are in <br />right now, a minimum of two parking stalls, and plus the two back-up areas. I realize what one <br />of the, Ricky€s sister was talking about, about like the plan may be not being really reflective of, <br />you know, if you do it by scale what could happen in that area. But, in fact, we do have scaled <br />plans that show that if the plans are approved as being proposed, you not only have two covered <br />stalls, but in the back of that you have a minimum of 18 to 20 feet to allow for tandem parking in <br />that area. <br />22EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />