PL-SPP-2022-000016 E. Utyro Testimony 01.03.23

Home

Why the secrecy? Are such searches meriting preferential public treatment for this permit? Is it really a great economic prospect that people can be searched and evicted with no notice? What about Housing laws concerning eviction? Has PD given any thought to ADA? Fine if they did but we don't see it. And what happens when and employee is no longer like-minded and in agreement with the nudity and sexual values of subject property? Are they forced to just quit? Has PD gone to the appropriate County attorneys for consultation in these regards? If so, fine but there is a keen public interest that needs to be addressed. 11) P. 12 and following of the PD report as to desired restrictions which are wholly insufficient at this time. Many corrections of violations need to occur before any serious consideration. How can the community be assured that violations won't be allowed for decades? Other neighbors will address the various inadequacies and the Commission should take it all very seriously because what PD has proposed isn't workable and far too much relies on good faith in the applicant that simply doesn't exist for many and likely most in the community. Others will submit testimony as to good faith. 12)The subject property is listed for sale. The PD makes no mention of this. The public doesn't know if this is an active or inactive listing but this matters a lot. While the situation is not good now we are not naive enough to believe it cannot be worse. But what we believe is especially relevant for PD and the Commission aside from the neighbor concerns as to a possible transfer is whether the applicants claims of economic hardship for not dealing with violations have any merit. The property is offered for$2 million We have reserved this final section for the Planning Commission to carefully weigh who we have been dealing with and with whom you are considering handing this special permit too. There is no better place to start than with his words. We believe the HER website gives some insight and we have provided some snippets above but arguably they may not be directly from the applicant personally but still clearly represent HER's administration. We shared the Tripadvisor review which is troubling but now we present Robert's firsthand views that we believe infuse his community. youtu.be www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn69UQpz39U This requires a little bit of patience but many parts will likely raise at least eyebrows for many people. youtu.be It gets really interesting at 2:15.