My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-05-08 TPUNAcdp
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-05-08 TPUNAcdp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:28:47 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:28:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
you’ll realize that Kurtistown is probably the fastest growing community as far as the <br />business district is concerned. We now have a 7-Eleven that just opened up, we have a <br />self-service pump, and believe it or not Kurtistown even has a traffic light. And we’re <br />expanding, and we want to expand more, and we want to create jobs for the community. <br />I submitted six pages of written arguments regarding what I consider a very, very bad <br />road plan. And I tried to address the situation that the Puna Community Development <br />Plan in my mind is a major complex legislation. And complex legislation should really <br />be scrutinized in every single aspect. And for a complex litigation or legislation to <br />simply go through the process that it did I think is very unwise because there’s a huge <br />amount of unintended consequences. I tried real hard, I worked real hard on this plan as <br />you can see from my submittal. But I felt that it really didn’t nail it on the head, and I <br />worked and worked. And if you’ll give a little time I’ll try to explain what I mean. <br />I’ve been a part of traffic planning for many, many years. I worked with Governor John <br />Burns in the 1960s when he was involved in designing the Queen K Highway. And in <br />understanding the economics and the velocity of Queen K Highway I learned that it has a <br />tremendous economic role to play. Now that’s really why I’ve gotten involved in the <br />Puna Community Development Plan. First of all, I was a member of the 1989 State of <br />Hawaii Long Range Transportation Plan. And in that plan I was probably the harshest <br />critic of the Department of Trans because I felt that they very, very badly manipulated <br />the process to a point where the consultant pretty much knew what he wanted to give us. <br />He let us put a lot of public input and piece by piece he got rid our input; and it ended up <br />with the final plan pretty much what they started with. And I thought it was very cynical <br />and I was very, very upset. And so I got involved with the Puna Regional Circulation <br />Plan which was ended in 2005 with the professional consultant that was responsible for <br />coming up with the final plan; and I think that the person did a great job. I know that not <br />everybody was happy but I felt that type of plan is far superior to what we have today. <br />The Community Development plan should be a master plan created by the Puna <br />Community. But it isn’t. The Hawaii County Planning Department who designed and <br />managed the process -. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Fukumoto, I don’t want to cut you short. I’m perfectly willing <br />to let you proceed a little further, but if you’re going to read your written testimony that <br />was provided to us then -. <br />FUKUMOTO: No, this is a condensed version. <br />WATANABE: Well, okay, let’s be mindful of the time then, please. <br />FUKUMOTO: Yes. <br />WATANABE: Cause I still have to be mindful of everyone else’s -. <br />FUKUMOTO: I understand. <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.