My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-12 TCELLCO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-05-12 TCELLCO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:35:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:35:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Commissioner Watanabe, theres some guidance, perhaps, that <br />Mr. Torigoe can offer us right now as far as us testifying as experts. <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, I would recommend against your, you know, providing what is <br />essentially testimony on a contested case matter. <br />DARROW:If I may address the question? <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Darrow. <br />DARROW:The Planning Director, when we look at requests for telecommunication <br />towers, his main objective in the beginning of the application is to request whether or not the <br />applicant has taken steps to co-locate on existing towers. If there are no options available, then <br />at that point well proceed with the special permit. In the special permit application, we always <br />trytorecommendco-locationofothertowerstobeabletolocateonthis. <br />Irecallintheapplicationthattheapplicantstatedthat,Ibelieve,thattherewouldberoomfor <br />one co-location on this tower. But if we could also allow the applicant to go into more detail <br />regarding co-location. I believe thats what youre asking, is that correct? <br />SIRCUSA:Yes. And then theres the follow up one which was d) on this, <br />Mr. Lipinskis communication, that Id also like to know if this is accurate, if a community <br />permits a cell tower within its geographical area, it is legally bound to allow competitive service <br />providers the right to install their towers as well? So would that mean that we would end up <br />having a plethora of towers within every single community once we give a permit to one? <br />DARROW:Yeah, its -. Oh, Im going to defer that to the Panning Director. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:A body like a Planning Commission can reject cell towers for reasons <br />unrelated to health of safety. For example, you can reject a cell tower in a particular location <br />because of its aesthetic effect. You cannot discriminate among providers. What that means is <br />that you cant say, well, I like Verizon and I dont like Cingular. So, and thats the only sense in <br />which you allow one you have to allow others. You can, if you allow one and somebody else <br />comes in with a cell tower in a location that has a much worse visual effect, you can reject the <br />second application. But you cant do it on the basis of, well, we let one company in and thats <br />good enough, we dont want to have more companies in here. <br />SIRACUSA:I see. Thank you for clarifying that. <br />SPRINGER:Jeff, perhaps I didnt go and pick up materials that might have come in <br />subsequent to when I did picked up my packets, but I dont have the record of the request for <br />standing. <br />DARROW:If its okay with you, I can bring you a copy of it. <br />3EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.