Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Sure does. <br />SPRINGER:So we have before us the application. We see that the status of the <br />petitioner, their interest is that they have responsibility for liability, traffic and trash on the <br />property, on the privately owned roadway necessary for ingress and egress to the proposed site. <br />Is there any discussion on this petition for standing? <br />ALAMEDA:Sounds like, if there€s no discussion then we would make a motion on it? <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. A question to Mr. Pawu, and I was wondering if your board also <br />directs you to protect their interests, visa vi, you know, aesthetic considerations, or property <br />values and developments that may affect the community, because the Board did that on some of <br />the previous things you were here for as an intervenor. And I€m wondering if that applies here <br />as well. <br />PAWU:Yes, yes, Madam Commissioner. It does apply here. And we were <br />specifically directed to ask for this contested case hearing based on the visual impact, the <br />possibleliabilityimpactsshouldthistowerfalloffofthepropertythatit€son.It€slocatedona <br />corner of the property, and it could fall on the roadway, block our roadway or damage a vehicle <br />driving on our private roadway and create liability for our organization. And these are under the <br />issues that we need to see addressed. <br />SIRACUSA:Then, may I continue? <br />SPRINGER:Yes, you may, Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Then you were saying that your interest differs from that of the general <br />public as you were representing the members and property owners of the subdivision in which <br />this development is proposed? <br />PAWU:That is correct. <br />ALAMEDA:Madam Chair? <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA:I was just curious, for the applicant, if you tried to remediate or work with <br />the board beforehand or -? <br />nd <br />YOUNG:I met with Mr. Pawu and his Board on March 22.Wehadanevening <br />meeting in which I made a presentation to the Board and, I guess, several of the ownersof the <br />Orchidlandarea.Atthattime,afterpresentingourproposal,therewassomediscussionon <br />alternative sites to be considered. Primary reason for alternate sites being, and if you can <br />interjectifImisstatesomeoftheconclusionsofthemeeting,wasthat,one,lookforanareathat <br />6EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />