My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-12 TCELLCO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-05-12 TCELLCO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:35:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:35:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
is commercially zoned or, perhaps, more in line with the type of use that we are recommending. <br />Mr. Pawu also gave me a name of one gentleman, who I contacted subsequent to our meeting. In <br />addition to that, I did follow up with calls to another person who owns commercial property, <br />several of which were discussed at earlier meetings today -- Mr. Vern Wood and his Orchidland <br />Trade Center Development, the Watumulls and their Wiki Wiki Mart area. Mr. Wood also owns <br />nd <br />a piece of property right off the Highway 130, I believe its on 32 Avenue just a bit off Makuu; <br />and then, of course, as was discussed by Jeff Darrow we did look at, once again at T Mobiles <br />existing 80-foot tower at the Ainaloa Longhouse. Mr. Pawu at that meeting also made reference <br />to the property that the Community Association had purchased; and that that might be a possible <br />th <br />consideration on 37 Street. However, one of the reasons why we did not seriously, or I did not <br />seriously entertain that as an option at that time is there was a lady, whose name escape me at the <br />moment, who is on the Board who reacted bodily language wise not too favorably when that was <br />discussed, because she owns fairly close by or right next to the existing community association <br />property. On a subsequent call, maybe about 2 or 3 weeks ago with Mr. Pawu he did mention <br />to me that perhaps that particular landowner, that lady would be able to remove herself from the <br />personal aspect of ownership and take a broader scope as to the overall benefit to the association; <br />and I just let that statement stand as is. So we did look at alternative locations, none of which at <br />this point in time have come through as far as anything firm that we could proceed on as a viable <br />alternative. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Young. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Madam Chair. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Alameda, any follow up to that. <br />ALAMEDA:No. <br />SPRINGER:OtherCommissioners,wehavebeforeusthispetitionforstandingina <br />contested case hearing. Our first order of business will be to determine whether or not to accept <br />thispetitionforstanding,andthenwellmoveforwardtoseewhetherornotwewanttoserveas <br />the hearings officers or outsource should this petition be accepted. Commissioner Iwashita, were <br />you stretching or were your raising your hand? <br />IWASHITA:Neither. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Madam Chair? <br />SPRINGER:Is there any discussion on this petition? Is there a motion? <br />ALAMEDA:Im ready to make a motion if no discussion. <br />SPRINGER:Proceed, Commissioner Alameda. <br />7EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.