My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-12 TYAMADA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-05-12 TYAMADA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:38:48 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:38:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Yeah, itsa little bit, I dont know, out of order, I suppose to try and work <br />up a package of conditions before you actually vote on the matter. I think that would be <br />something that you could do informally just by way of deliberation, you know, as youre <br />discussing this matter on the record, to discuss among yourselves what kinds of conditions you <br />think would be appropriate. Bear in mind also in all of this that at this point the Planning <br />Director is a party also and will be a party, and if theres a formal contested case will be down <br />functioning as a party at the party table; and the Planning Director will have some input along <br />the way as well. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Torigoe, should we treat Mr. Yuen as a party at this point? <br />TORIGOE:Well, again, this is a matter of, its a little bit strange because we have a <br />conditional withdrawal on the table. The parties, basically, I think, should be consulted as to <br />howtheywouldliketohavethishandledfortoday. <br />SPRINGER:Okay.Letsdothatnext.Ifwecouldhearfromthepartiesthen,starting <br />with the applicant, and followed by the Planning Director, and then the Community Association, <br />please. Mr. Fuke? <br />FUKE:Yes, sure. Madam Chair, on behalf of the applicant we would not mind <br />having the Commission go through like a modified contested case hearing as suggested by your <br />legal counsel. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:The request here for modification, withdrawal if certain conditions are <br />met, the Commission can only go so far with that. The applicant can withdraw their request for <br />certain parts of their permit. If the applicant says we no longer are requesting a gas station under <br />the special permit, then the Commission cant give them a gas station. So that part is under the <br />applicants control. When people come in for special permit, theyre asking for a particular use. <br />So that part is under their control, and they can sit here and they can say were withdrawing the <br />gas station. Or if they come in with a video rental store, they could say, well, were withdrawing <br />the video rental store. And so we can do that right now. The request that the Commission agree <br />in advance that they will put certain conditions on like payment of fees to the Orchidland <br />Community Association, the Commission cant do that now. The Commission cant do that until <br />its about to vote on the permit. And at that point, and they cant be about to vote on the permit <br />until it has, it hears all the testimony, it asks all the questions, it closes the hearing, and it starts to <br />make its deliberations. So it cant sit here and say, well, we agree that if we do approve this <br />permit, we will put these conditions on it. That puts the Community Association in a little bit of <br />a dilemma about what to do at this point. <br />Now the applicant can contractually agree with the Community Association that they will do <br />certain things. They can make a private contract to do that. But the Commission sitting here <br />9 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.