Laserfiche WebLink
officials including of course Planning Department, Planning Commission, individual <br />Commissioners, City Council members, Corporate Counsel, Engineers, Fire Chiefs, County <br />Clerk, Deputy Clerk and the list goes on and on. And, my point here is that we€ve heard their <br />concerns. My entire team has heard their concerns. We understand their concerns. I think <br />there€s other people that have heard this concerns and understand their concerns. And, we <br />believe that they have all been adequately addressed and part of it is because of this 2 year long <br />th <br />process we€re in our 7 hearing. So, I€m all about trying to gather consensus and work together <br />with people but when do we get to the point where we say enough is enough. And I have been, <br />my wife and I have been the property owners for the last year and I€m starting to think that you <br />know jeez I can have property rights too especially when a few of these units are going to be <br />used for my family€s vacation home. So, I feel like I understand what they€re looking for, I <br />clearly understand. I went through all the hearing notes. I went through all the correspondence <br />and I understand what they€re looking for. And lastly I€d just like to point out that the neighbors <br />to the immediate south, which is Sea Village withdrew their contested case okay. And it was my <br />understanding that at that meeting which they have every year for the 130 condo owners that <br />there was no concern expressed over our project. And they were clearly aware that we had the <br />contested case hearing. Secondly the neighbor to the immediate east, Vacation Internationale, <br />they€re clearly supportive of the project because they€re giving us easement for vehicular access <br />aswellasutilities,whichincludesewers.Sothere€snotgoingtobeawastewatertreatment <br />plant, which I saw on, I don€t know, probably 20 letters. So to hold this process for continued <br />negotiations with Mr. Haney and Mr. Buscemi I think is fruitless. I think it panders to their <br />stalling techniques and continues this nonsense. So, in that regard and I€m, you know, I€m <br />willing to talk to them but I€m just not-. I don€t think it€s fair to continue to stall this process and <br />if these guys want to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court my wife and I are ready for the ride. So, I <br />apologize for being a little bit excited here and fired up but I do respect the Commission and <br />especially your thoughts and opinions. And you know my wife and I are just, you know we€re <br />requesting that we get a favorable recommendation on behalf of the Planning Department€s <br />recommendation. Thanks. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Huggett. Are there any questions of the testifier from the <br />Planning Commission? The question before us then is whether or not to- Commissioner <br />Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Mr. Huggett was any representation made to you at the time you <br />purchased the property to whether or not you had a right to this application process. <br />HUGGETT:Yes, it was my understanding through the due diligence that I had done <br />that we did have a right to pick up this application. <br />IWASHITA:Who told you that? <br />HUGGETT:Well, I€ve heard it from various people. I talked to Greg Mooers. <br />IWASHITA:Anyone else? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />16 <br /> <br />