2005-05-20 EXHIBIT C HUGGETT PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

they would be the ones to act on these requests and also to determine whether these are properly filed applications. Thank you. SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Hayashi. Are there any questions of Mr. Hayashi from the Planning Commission at this time? I have a number of questions that were- come to mind given Mr. Hayashis comments to us. First of all to Mr. Torigoe regarding the minutes which have been submitted to us as part of an exhibit but which we have not yet received as part of our work as Planning Commissioners. They came to us this morning I believe and how should we dispose of them? TORIGOE:Are these minutes, are they before you today? nd SPRINGER:We received the excerpt of the April 22 transcript this morning. TORIGOE:Right, and thats the exhibits. But were- okay so were the minutes for that transcript or was that transcript ever brought before you or is it before you today for approval? SPRINGER:I have not received- none of us have received copies of those minutes. TORIGOE:All right. Well, I think maybe what we should do is, we will have to be discussing the acceptance of these submissions so maybe at that point we can get from the parties or the proposed parties and make a determination at that time. For instance is there can be some agreement that the Commission can consider these then that would be an easy disposition of them. If not well have to consider what other routes might be taken. SPRINGER:Thank you and then with regard to the form of the requests for standing, Norman gave us quite a litany of descriptors some of which came in letter form, some were checks without written documentation or one was a check without written documentation. And they seem to come in unevenly. Can you give us any guidance on how we should treat those requests? TORIGOE:Well the Rule 4-7A says that people seeking to intervene as a party shall fileawrittenrequestandtheformisprovidedinappendixAandaccompaniedbyafilingfee. And again as weve noted no later than 7 calendar days prior to the Commissions first meeting on the matter. And so I think what we need to do is- you know were going to have to discuss that whole issue of- as we discussed in the previous hearing the whole issue of whether we should consider this a new application and therefore whether these kinds of requests for intervention should be considered timely under this rule. So again thats something we can address as we deal with the standing issues. SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Torigoe. Then a question for Mr. Yuen with regard to the memo that weve received from Council Person Isbell and her concern with regard to County Code for driveways and that shes in the process of upgrading that code. Do you have any comments to us? I think that the request is that all hearings on driveways or permits for driveways be postponed until we have this ordinance finished and reference is then made to that in correspondence from Brian Haney. EXHIBIT C 3