My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-20 EXHIBIT B CC Bill No 23 Draft 2 PC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-05-20 EXHIBIT B CC Bill No 23 Draft 2 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:43:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:43:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
But life in government is seldom that easy. That the nature of Chapter 10 posting signs, it <br />doesnt lend itself I think, as youve been able to see to this type of ordinance. I have not <br />forgotten about that aspect cause that is one of the most troubling aspects. But this was not the <br />Bill to do it under. Even under the Chapter 10 Rules that may get changed, I havent really <br />discovered exactly the solution to it yet but I would look forward to some input or any ideas from <br />any of you that you might have on this. And Id be very happy to work with you in particular on <br />this Rene. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. Id be glad to give you manao. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Commissioner Siracusa. Other Commissioners? <br />Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:No. No. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:The changes suggested by the Director as far as the limitation on land use <br />districtboundaryamendmentsandtheapplicationofthischangetoalsoCouncilaction,doyou <br />agree with those also? <br />JACOBSON:Yes, I think that Chris has got some wisdom in this area and Im willing to <br />honor that wisdom and follow his good advice. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Commissioner Iwashita. Other Commissioners? <br />Commissioner McCall. <br />MCCALL:My question, Im not sure if its to you Bob or to Chris. Were looking- <br />Chris your recommendations are to I guess to have this not include anything that goes to the <br />State Land Use Commission, from what I understand. I know the County doesnt have <br />jurisdiction over that but could we still have jurisdiction over posting the sign if something is <br />going there? <br />YUEN:Well this would- the recommendation is that it not apply to boundary <br />amendments of the State Land Use Commission since those are entirely done by the State Land <br />Use Commission. No, I dont think that we can make a rule that covers- or pass a County <br />ordinance that covers how a State Land Use Commission is supposed to do that. Typically <br />though, the State Land Use Commission action will be followed by some County rezoning <br />action. So, at the rezoning level there would be this posting of notice. The only thing I can <br />suggest is for the- the Council member could write to the Land Use Commission and suggest that <br />they- that they change their own rules accordingly. But we cant pass a County ordinance that <br />says this is what you have to do at the Land Use Commission. <br />MCCALL:Thank you. <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.