My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:47:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that this Community Development Plan for Kona needs to address, and to me once it <br />becomes law that, I am a really strong advocate for, you know, really not doing this piece- <br />meal kind of zoning changes because we’re going to end up with Fort Weaver Road or lots of <br />them. We have a potential of having lots more Fort Weaver Roads -. <br />WATANABE: Okay. <br />IWASHITA: You know, and so -. <br />WATANABE: Okay, but, Mr. Iwashita, maybe we could concentrate on -. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I’ll end up with my question. So my question <br />is do you agree with me or not that your considering the final version of the Kona <br />Community Development Plan would be important in order to come up with a valid TIAR? <br />WATANABE: You may respond, Mr. Okaneku. <br />. <br />OKANEKU: If I were looking at a, you know, a 2,000 unit development I would <br />say yes. And if I’m looking at, you know, 100-unit development, it -, you know, when you <br />look at the grand scheme of things, the 100-unit development is just like a drop, you know, in <br />a floodway. I mean this is -. <br />IWSAHITA: I agree with you 100 percent. But we have to consider not only the 65 <br />units in this development. We have to consider the proposed affordable housing on the other <br />property that this applicant owns and we have to consider the cumulative effect of all the <br />other potential developments in the area. Right? And so that’s why I’m saying considering <br />this would be important because it would seem to me that your assumption of two percent <br />has to be measured against what actually comes out. Wouldn’t you agree? <br />WATANABE: Okay, well, we are not -. <br />OKANEKU: Can I respond to that? <br />WATANABE: Excuse me. I want to remind you we’re not deliberating on this yet; <br />we’re just asking questions of the developer. We’ll deliberate and you can justify your <br />Community Development Plan and your other assumptions during deliberation. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’m trying to make my record. <br />WATANABE: Well, if I go back to the last four years you’ve exceeded that. <br />IWASHITA: Well, except, about, about three, Mr. Chair, but I want to -. <br />WATANABE: Three and a half, three and a half. <br />IWASHITA: I want to make my record in this case. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.