My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:47:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Go ahead. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay, you were pointing to that upper left-hand corner and saying <br />that’s where you’re considering the park. But I just pulled that, the map, and that shows that <br />that’s where the archaeological sites are.So could you address that, how you’re going to <br />work those two functions in? <br />ATTA: Actually, the arch site is -. <br />WATANABE: Mike, please. Thank you. <br />ATTA: Okay, the arch site actually is, most of the arch site really is on the <br />makai parcel that doesn’t belong to us; and part of that spills over into our site. So in reality <br />the entrance road separates the arch site from the thing. So when we mentioned this parcel, <br />this parcel does not have the arch sites. So, yeah, so there really is no conflict cause the arch <br />site is in this area here, across the street from the park. <br />BOWMAN: Mr. Chairman? <br />WATANABE: Can we hold our questions maybe till they’re done with their <br />presentation? <br />BOWMAN: Sure. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Lim, you want to proceed? <br />LIM: Well, if they have questions, I guess, on the application itself maybe <br />we can answer those and we can handle everything at the end. Please go ahead. <br />WATANABE: Oh, okay. Then Ms. Bowman you had a question? <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. Five thousand square feet is not considered a park. So it <br />would be, could you maybe elaborate on that? <br />LIM: We’re envisioning this to be a recreational area, like a tot lot. We <br />haven’t talked with -. <br />BOWMAN: A tot lot, I’m sorry -? <br />LIM: Right. It’s one of those that is not a ballpark or those types of things; <br />and this is intended to provide some buffer to the adjacent property owner also. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, just that one lot as a buffer? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.