Laserfiche WebLink
EMLER: You know, I don’t want to be on record stating that unless I review the file <br />again. <br />WATANABE: Okay, okay, thank you. Well, I guess -. Yes, Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: I’m looking at the background report, Page 5, No. 21, and the very last <br />statement talking about Historic Preservation’s no-effect letter says that they believe “that no <br />historic properties will be affected by this proposed activity because new construction or land <br />alteration will occur in connection with this permit ….;” but I thought that they are going to use <br />the existing farm dwelling as the office, and that there will be no new construction. So my <br />question then is is this just a typo or is there something I’m missing about other construction or <br />are they referring perhaps to the deck or the continuing construction of the music building? <br />DARROW: This is unusual for this particular -, for them to use this statement, <br />“because new construction or land alteration will occur ….;” it usually is “has occurred.” But in <br />this particular case the dwelling has been built, or the office has been built. The proposed music <br />therapy building and deck are under construction; they probably were under construction at the <br />time that they applied for this or maybe at the time they were coming in for permits for that. But <br />this is Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division, which <br />we look towards for their comments on historical sites that would be affected, and they are <br />saying that there will be no historical sites affected by this project. <br />WATANABE: We might, Ms. Siracusa, clarify that when the applicant comes up because <br />it’s also my understanding -. <br />SIRACUSA: Well, we could do that. Because then I should think that it would say, <br />“because no new construction or land alteration -.” <br />WATANABE: I understand what you are saying. But if we really want to confirm that, <br />we might want to confirm that with the applicant’s representative that no new construction will <br />occur, rather than try to confirm that with Mr. Darrow. <br />SIRACUSA: Thank you. Will the applicant please make a note to address this. <br />WATANABE: Well, do we have any further questions? I’m sorry, Mr. Rho, we couldn’t <br />get you a definitive answer on this; obviously they weren’t quite prepared on that. But it seems <br />like they have made some progress. As I recall at our last discussion on this, they did not yet <br />have approval from the State. <br />So with that, I’ll call up the applicant’s representative, Mr. Mooers. May I swear both of you in. <br />Raise your right hand, please. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Planning <br />Commission? <br />MOOERS: I do. <br />R. LELAH: I do. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />7 <br /> <br />