2008-05-22 TPUNACDP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

TORIGOE: Well, you’ve got them into the record by way of public testimony for this item, this agenda item, CDP review, but it is not in the record for purposes of the contested case matter on the permitting for the Sullivans. SIRACUSA: So is there a process whereby it could be placed in the record? YUEN: I think we circulated a picture that was basically very -, taken at the same time that showed the same thing. So -, at the meeting -. SIRACUSA: Actually, no, this is much more obviously the ocean coming in on these -. YUEN: We can -. SIRACUSA: I don’t know if you looked at these, Mr. Director, but -. YUEN: We’ll submit it for this item at the next meeting. SIRACUSA: Thank you. WATANABE: Okay. Let’s take five. RECESSED The Chair called a recess at 5:52 p.m. (At this time, 5:56 p.m., the Chair announced that the Commission will now take up Item No. 6 regarding H.O.V.E. Road Maintenance Corporation, SPP 740, due to the fact that Commissioner Rho must be excused about 6:00 p.m. and Commissioner Woodward will abstain, which will result in a lack of quorum for that application. At 6:07 p.m., the Commission again took up the subject matter.) WATANABE: We were finishing up on the Puna Community Development Plan. We finished up with the public testimony. And so maybe I can call up Mr. Brown and Mr. Olson for their response and any further questions or concerns that any other Commissioners might want to express at this time. And I’ll open it up to you all. If you have any responses or -. BROWN: I could only offer to repeat my opening remarks in response to some of the testimony that was provided subsequent to that. And I feel that would just be the same thing over again. So I’ll refrain. WATANABE: Well -. Yes, Mr. Olson. OLSON: Well, I mean, I have some comment on process, I suppose. On the issue of, you know, the necessity of following the existing General Plan, I would point out that on the last General Plan, because the Council failed to pass by ordinance the previous Puna plan in ’95, Puna did not really have an equitable opportunity to input on the General Plan; so when the last amendments to the General Plan were done to it, there was no standing document representing my community. So the other thing was that we didn’t do this with following what was in the General Plan to begin with. Our marching orders were follow the community’s wishes; and EXHIBIT C 24