My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:55:26 PM
Creation date
2/12/2023 1:53:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />March 10, 2022 <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: So, before I get into that, I just want to mention that police department— <br />and <br />epartmentand I'll tell you why the Chief and I had an extensive discussion. The Police Department was <br />carved out of this only because the Police Department is required to meet certain standards. <br />They're accredited they're an accredited organization by GALEA. <br />And so, the current performance system that they have in place is within the standards of the <br />police department. And so, the Police Department is carved out. And it's because they hold <br />their—and I can share the policy and procedures with you all. But we really made it easier for <br />the departments, especially, with blue-collar workers—blue-collar supervisors. <br />But the police department is held to a much higher standard because they carry firearms, because <br />they're apprehending criminals, and they're transporting criminals—and that also includes their <br />support staffs, which includes the Communications Division. <br />So, the Chief and I, we talked about it. And, for now, the Police Department is carved out of that <br />system. And once you see the new form that we've rolled out, you'll understand why it does not <br />incorporate everything that is really important in a police department. <br />MR. KUNZ: Waylen, is it my understanding that the rollout date or implementation would reach <br />a point where all supervisors by then, would equitably be trained and ready to implement? <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: I'm sorry, Charlie, could you repeat that? <br />MR. KUNZ: Yeah. Is it my understanding that the rollout date for actual implementation would <br />be after all supervisors are trained so that it being equitable to all supervisors having access <br />instead of just some supervisors that might start having to do appraisals when they all should be <br />doing appraisals. <br />So, would the rollout date be the issuedI guess the issue date to roll it out, all the supervisors <br />would be trained by then? <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Correct. We are, kind of, in a transition period and until the supervisors <br />are trained they cannot use the new form. So, we're working—it's just because there are just too <br />many supervisors that have to get trained, we just couldn't get to them. So, there is a transition <br />period that we're working with and we have one trainer. But we did want to—we are, kind of, <br />delayed on the rollout because I believe the rollout was supposed to have been at the end of last <br />year—and we didn't want to hold it back. <br />So, we're kind of in a transition period but I understand the equitable piece that we're trying to <br />work with because we have some supervisors that are trained and the ones that are not—cannot <br />use this form. <br />MR. KUNZ: Okay. So, I guess, you're answering part of my question. So, the ones that are <br />trained can use it. <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.