My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:55:26 PM
Creation date
2/12/2023 1:53:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />March 10, 2022 <br />The training not only covered the policy and the form but it also provided basic information on <br />why a performance evaluation system is in place. The HRS really doesn't go into detail as to <br />what the requirements—specific requirements are in doing performance appraisals. It, basically, <br />just says that we have to do an annual evaluation on all of our employees. So, we have the <br />flexibility to put in place what we feel is—what works for our County. <br />And they've been very pleased with the additional training on, not only how to use the form, but <br />how to effectively complete a performance appraisal form. So, that's working out very well. <br />Our department has committed to provide regular check -ins with the supervisors, just so that <br />they don't feel like this is something that we're just throwing on them. We're going to provide <br />them regular check -ins and opportunities for feedback. Because, as I mentioned to Jenny, if this <br />is something that we need to pivot on at some point, we can do that. <br />That—so, basically, that's where we're at with the performance appraisal form and policy and <br />procedure. Any questions with that? <br />CHR. CABANAS: I have one, Waylen. <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Sure. <br />CHR. CABANAS: So, you said 326 supervisors were trained, you're halfway through the <br />training. So, are the 326 from a wide spectrum of the departments? <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Yes. I wouldn't say it's heavily weighted on one department `cause that <br />would kind of concern me. Well, I do want to say Public Works—certain of the—certain Big 7 <br />departments take an active interest in the performance appraisal system. So, a lot of these <br />departments really push for training of their employees and supervisors. So, we did get a huge <br />group from Public Works part of that 326. <br />But, otherwise, it's pretty—it's dispersed among all departments. Their—all departments have, <br />kind of, a vested interest. So, we're seeing responses from all departments. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. So, if the policy and procedures implemented, the form is <br />institutedso, likeso, let's say for police, which is a big department, fire—another big <br />department—how do you ensure the process is being equitable if only certain supervisors—let's <br />say, those two departmentsI'm getting the training and others are not. You know what I'm <br />trying to say? <br />Is it equitably moving forward among all the supervisors and is there an internal timeline for <br />police? Is there an internal timeline for fire? Especially those two departments because they <br />operate under like semi -military procedures, yeah, their setup is that way—especially for them. <br />How is it moving equitably moving forward for those two departments especially? <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.