My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-03-10 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:55:26 PM
Creation date
2/12/2023 1:53:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board March 10, 2022 <br />b) Legislative Update <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Moving on to the "Legislative Update," I kind of wanted to bring you all <br />up to speed as to where we're at tracking certain bills that may affect us in Human Resources. <br />So, we're actually working with the Employer group, which includes all HR directors from the <br />State of Hawaii tracking specific bills that are currently going through the House and Senate. <br />The first one is House—Senate Bill 2705. Senate Bill 2705 actually was proposed to reinstate <br />the Public Employee Compensation Appeals Board. And what that does is it sets up a board that <br />their sole purpose is to hear re -pricing grievances from members within bargaining units. <br />That becomes a problem because the way House Bill 20—Senate Bill 2705 was written, the <br />required number of members is heavily weighted on the unions end. If I remember correctly, it <br />was 13 union members to 7 employer representatives. <br />So, just in that setup alone it's problematic for all employers because it'll be in favor of the <br />pricing. And so, they would have the authority to move forward any pricing grievances. And if <br />it was denied by the employer, basically, we would go through 89, which allows them to go <br />through the arbitration process. <br />This would add a third layer of re-pricing—the opportunity to grieve re -pricing because we <br />already have it built in where re -pricing is brought up through the negotiations process. So, this <br />almost be like a double -whammy for the employer because unions can come in at the <br />negotiations process and they can now go through this board to bring up re -pricing grievances, <br />which would have a tremendous impact on employer budgets—and it would be a significant <br />impact. <br />So, that's kind of the gist of the senate bill. I did submit testimony against Senate Bill 2705. <br />And Senate Bill 2707 is very similar. <br />Senate Bill 2707 proposes that the unions may submit a grievance for re -pricing directly to the <br />employer and has 30 days to respond. And, if no agreement is met within 90 days of the filing of <br />the grievance, then we go—it's considered an impasse and we would also go through arbitration. <br />So, that's even another—it's adding another opportunity for members to come in and grieve their <br />compensation. So, thisI also submitted testimony against Senate Bill 2707 as it would there <br />will be significant impacts on the employer. <br />The third bill that I wanted to bring up is Senate Bill 2018, I'm sure you all are familiar with is <br />the increased minimum wage, which we're tracking very closely. Although this bill excludes <br />government entities, as you know, we're all having a difficulty with recruitment—having <br />positions in the County that pay less than minimum wage is just going to add to that. <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.