My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-04-08 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
2022-04-08 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:20:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2023 2:21:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />April 8, 2022 <br />we ask is follow the process, ring the first doorbell, and get your answer. And if it's not an <br />appropriate answer, then elevate. <br />So, that's what we're, again, trying to educate them or trying to achieve that curve. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Benner. Any other questions for Mr. Benner? <br />Mr. Ventura, do you have any questions for Mr. Benner. <br />MR. VENTURA: No questions. Thank you. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Benner, you may proceed. <br />MR. BENNER: Sure. Thank you. Okay. So, "Recommendation" number "Y' we recommend <br />the Department of Human Resources develop and implement policies and procedures that <br />address monitoring and oversight of Countywide interviewing and selection process to deter, <br />detect, and prevent questionable hiring practices and ensure compliances with applicable laws, <br />rules, and regulations. <br />DHR audited 22 interview packets for compliance with the Merit Principle. DHR initiated the <br />interview packet audits in 2018. We did have a noted exception as we were doing our testing <br />Mass Transit missed their deadline. It's our understanding that that hiring was that particular <br />position, they were not able to proceed with that as having missed the deadline, and the mayor's <br />office had no qualifying recruitments to test. <br />So, to verify that status, we reviewed the process and found no exceptions other than that noted <br />above. I should specify that for follow-up audits, we don't make additional recommendations <br />`cause we won't do a follow-up on the follow-up for the original audit. But we did identify <br />additional opportunities to further strengthen monitoring and oversight. <br />Had we been—had I been involved in the initial audit, I would have offered this recommendation <br />in addition to those at that time, which is to adopt monitoring and oversight procedures to define <br />nepotism, define conflict of interest, define familiar relationships—including hanai relationships, <br />establish policies addressing nepotism and conflicts of interest, disclose any potential conflict of <br />interest on the interview panel acknowledgment form. <br />So, we offer those proactively to the Department in the hope that that would nullify the need to <br />do an additional audit in the future. And we consider this status, at this time, completed. <br />All right, so "Recommendation 4"—we recommend the Department of Human Resources <br />require individual hiring departments use the NeoGov System to track and monitoring the status <br />of candidates during the interview and selection process. <br />I'm accustomed to NeoGov prior to working for the County and it does carry with it a wonderful <br />audit trail. So, I'm an advocate of that system. DHR requires all departments to conduct all <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.