2007-05-24 TPDWAIMEAREZ - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

and I’m on the Steering Committee for the South Kohala CDP, but I’m not speaking for those groups today. The reason this is so important to the community, and has been for over 30 years now when our Community Association started requesting this very thing, is that it’s home to a Hawaiian god and goddess; it towers above the only woman’s heiau on our island. And it’s the site of the battle that’s described in the paperwork that you’ve been reading. So it’s really important to so many aspects of our community. It’s particularly important to the Hawaiian community many of whom have expressed to me and to the community at large their personal family relationship to physical features on the parcel, and others who retell these various legends – a whole bunch of them – having to do with just that parcel and the adjoining ones. These legends have given the place names that we use everyday all over Waimea, so it is part of the identity of the community and it’s important for that way. It’s important because visitors and new comers just absolutely fall in love with the misty hills with the cows calling to their calves that they see up there, so it’s important to a lot of the community. It cries out for conservation and our community has echoed that cry for over 30 years. It’s a pilot project of our Waimea CDP Committee and we are asking for it to be done, so that we can learn as a community how to work with our government and develop a relationship with it because not a strong one exists right now. And we really ask your help in protecting the sacred land by giving a favorable recommendation. You might know, as you read your paper, that the Council requested that the parcel be down- zoned to Ag-500. And the reason for that was to do exactly -, was to create a non-conforming lot that is a lot that no one could build on. State law gives the County the power – and the sole power – of creating minimum lot sizes on parcels; and we can’t see anything in the law or in the regulations or in resolutions of the County Council that would prevent the creation of a non- conforming lot, which would seal the fate of development up there, instead of having a 400-acre situation and a 20-point-something-acre situation. So that’s why the 500 was requested; and we request that you seriously consider recommending that as it moves upstream. That’s my testimony, and I’d be open to any questions. Thank you. GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Hunter. Any questions from the Commissioners? Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: I commend you folks for embarking on this task. I think with today’s vote, you and your organization would further realize how much important it is that citizen input be considered in this kind of matter, especially land use planning. Because often times when decisions are being made for rezoning or boundary amendments, or General Plan amendments, it comes before a body at a moment’s notice or without any recognition by the community or its organizations, and it’s simply because there isn’t much interest generated within the community. But with this happening, I’m sure you and your organization would now realize that it can be done. And what I encourage you and your organization, as you embark in considering your community development plan, look at other areas within the community that you as residents of the area feel is best for you, and make the decision to pursue it because it’s possible as you’ll find out hopefully after this meeting. I know of other places, more specific in Waikii, where many years ago there were rezonings to the effect and they created residential-agricultural lots with a particular agricultural and livestock program that would have each interest in property owners contribute to establishing a livestock program; and in doing so in obtaining those parcels, smaller parcels for home sites, they would use one community designated area as a pasture EXHIBIT D 3