My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TPDWAIMEAREZ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TPDWAIMEAREZ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:25 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:54:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
owned by all of the people; and all the rest of the property surrounding that were down-zoned to, <br />I think, probably no smaller than 1,000-acre Ag zoning. And this would ensure in perpetuity that <br />those lands would be in huge parcels that would further prevent additional development up there. <br />So that’s why there you hardly see anyone rushing up there and rezoning properties or building, <br />with the exception of what you see now; they are all scattered. So, you know, with some <br />innovative ideas and especially with the desire with respect to what you really want in the <br />community, you folks can do it. This is your opportunity. Thank you for what you’re doing. <br />GRAHAM: Any further questions from the Commissioners? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. I am so happy that I’m going to be a part of, by casting my vote <br />preserving the pu‘u in Waimea because I have always loved them. And I just wanted to say that <br />I think asking for Ag-400 as a zoning doesn’t say that these 20 acres over here are left out. That <br />zoning for Ag-400 is for the entire 420 acres.So I don’t think you really have to worry about <br />that 20 acres would not be protected from development by virtue of that zoning, because you’d <br />still get what you want and that’s the protection without necessarily the creation of a non- <br />conforming lot. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Commissioner Siracusa. I’d also like to just reiterate I agree <br />with the 400-acre zoning. I mean you folks know there’s lots of properties in Waimea that are <br />zoned Ag-1a, that the lots are much less than Ag-1a in size, yet people can build on them just <br />like anywhere else. So I don’t think you’d be buying any additional protection, if you had Ag- <br />500. And like Commissioner Siracusa said, there is no way to get two lots out of it. And I also, <br />like the Planning Director, don’t like to create non-conforming lots in any rezoning before us. <br />So I think you’re fine with what we’ve got. <br />Any other Commissioners? Thank you. Ms. Wille. <br />WILLE: Hi. Yes. My name is Margaret Wille. I live in Waimea, 65-1316 Lihipali <br />Road. And I am also on the South Kohala Community Development Steering Committee, and <br />again want to express that these are my own views. And I am an attorney. And again I just want <br />to say this is, I am not representing any other person. <br />I have been working with Bob Hunter on the community development process, and was the co- <br />chairman of the conservation sub-group that initiated and worked on the plans promoting the <br />protection of this parcel. I want to add to what Bob said in terms of seeing the Waimea pu‘u as a <br />landmark, as Diamond Head is to Honolulu and as Mauna Kea is to our entire island. Certainly <br />these hills are an equivalent spiritual, emotional, intellectual, inspirational place. In going <br />through the County General Plan in almost every section it would say something about <br />protecting these hills from development. For example: environmental – that this is extremely <br />ecologically sensitive land. Flooding – there is terrible risk, even from if too many jeeps go up <br />that. Then I said, well, let me look at the State law, and I started going through the State law that <br />would apply, such as the public trust doctrine and viewing ourselves as stewards for ourselves <br />and future generations. And for historical preservation – the historical and cultural significance <br />of this parcel has been outlined. Such properties are so critical for the education, inspiration and <br />pleasure and enrichment of the citizens, yet we are losing these assets. I think one thing that <br />geared us up is that the Parker Ranch range lease expires in four years. And you know if all of <br />the sudden this land came up for auction or something happened, how, what would we do? And <br />EXHIBIT D <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.