My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TSunstone
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TSunstone
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:57:54 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:57:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOOERS:No, I made multiple attempts to contact them and I could not. I believe <br />this conversation was with Mr. Allen, and he said that he would try to go by their unit. <br />Apparently, they travel a good deal and theyre not always here in Hawai i. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. I gotcha. Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Either Mr. Lim or Mr. Mooers, with the new alignment right now, where <br />would, how far away would their residence or their lot be from the driveway? <br />LIM:Ballparking about a thousand feet. I believe the Scotts are the only ones <br />from the original group who havent withdrawn. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />ALLEN:Thats not correct. <br />LIM:Okay. Im sorry. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I have a question for counsel. It seems that it would appear that <br />Mr. Allen who has not been called up yet is you know, seeking standing in this, even though he <br />is located in that same apartment complex that the Scotts are located in. <br />ALLEN:The president of the association -. <br />WATANABE: Yeah. Im wondering, you know, if standing is, if we shouldnt consider it <br />because now the roadway is moved. Is there any guarantee the roadway is going to remain <br />where it is now? Not that I didnt have any objection to it being on either side but, you know -. <br />Is there any harm in granting them standing when their only objection is the former location of <br />the mauka-makai connector? <br />TORIGOE:Its up to the Commission to determine on a case-by-case, person-by- <br />person basis, whether under the facts it seems like the petitioner has an interest clearly <br />distinguishable from that of the general public. So, you know, if you want to call <br />Mr. Allen up and ask him for further information, you can do that. Its basically a . <br />ALAMEDA:I know Mr. Allen is back there and wanting to come up. But are still <br />working on Malcolm and Virginia Scott? <br />ALLEN:I can help clarify that. <br />TORIGOE:You are. But I think you have, you know, you have the ability to, it was <br />testimony from people who are willing to come and provide it. <br />ALAMEDA:Right. Okay. And to just stand corrected, the Petition for Standing by <br />James Allen was not withdrawn. <br />8EXHIBIT E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.