My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:59:15 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:59:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Well, I mean, if the stabilizing is not going to be, then you dont have to <br />do anything. But you could essentially guarantee a stabilization of the Trail up to the most <br />mauka elevation of your property. And if its State-owned, I guess, is it not permissible for you <br />to do that? <br />MOORE:It would be very difficult to recreate something that was never <br />documented. You know, at this point, as we extended further mauka of whats existing, wed <br />almost be guessing at the morphology of what was there before. You know, we dont have <br />documentation at this point. The bi-faced core filled walls, parallel walls, continue all the way <br />up to Hualalai, the Trail was once 16 miles long and it reached up to the Heiau Ahu-a-Umi. It <br />hasnt been thoroughly described in the entire length. <br />GRAHAM:I think Mr. Yuen certainly understands where Im coming from. And so, <br />youknow,ratherthanhavingyoutrytoreplicatesomethingthatexistedhistoricallywhatIm <br />really looking for most is that it be there for public use and in a usable fashion; and so anything <br />that might be an impediment to that, that you folks would take care of as far as your mauka <br />boundary. Is that workable, Chris, or is there some way you could do that? <br />YUEN:Let me just say I want to understand this correctly. Do the parallel walls <br />continue where it goes off your property? <br />MOORE:As far as I know, no. There has been some documentation several <br />thousand meters, a couple of miles, but Im not familiar exactly with the site description from <br />those work -. <br />YUEN:What I mean is on this Diagram A-1 that we were looking at, it shows <br />parallel walls within your metes and bounds. And then it, they did not attempt to map this to the <br />property to the south, apparently, because it goes off onto whats shown as a State easement on <br />the tax maps. <br />MOORE:Well, whats shown on the map is basically whats on the ground now. <br />YUEN:Okay, so the parallel walls, where it goes off the metes and bounds of the <br />property, the parallel walls stop? <br />MOORE:Correct. <br />YUEN:Theyve been destroyed already? <br />MOORE:Correct. <br />YUEN:Okay. So my suggestion, theres nothing to stabilize past this 100-foot <br />stretch of parallel walls. So my suggestion would be simply that they, that we have a condition <br />that they stabilize that stretch of the Judd Trail, including the walls that line it. They would still <br />have to actually get consent of SHPD to do this work, in any event, both from an archeological <br />10EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.