My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:59:15 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:59:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a reason to vote against this project. It just feels likeahard issue to handle here today since we <br />dont have the metes and bounds and its -. <br />YUEN:Well,ifI could suggest, maybe Mr. Moore can help here. I believe theres <br />a level of work that youd call stabilization. <br />MOORE:Yes. <br />YUEN:And would you explain that? <br />MOORE:That would be taking the deteriorated portions, retrieving stones that have <br />fallen off the wall, refacing the wall, reconstructing those portions of the wall so that theyre bi- <br />faced core filled, intact. You know, this northern wall is in good condition at this point, but wed <br />recreate it to look and be the same size and shape as the northern wall. Theres a dilapidated <br />woodengatethatwouldneedtobereplacedorremoved.Thatwoodengatewasnotlikelypart <br />of the original structure. It was probably put in after the fact, early 1900s, to control cattle or <br />something like that. You know, at one point they believed it was used as a chute to bring cattle <br />down to the coast. <br />YUEN:I think Mr. Lau has expressed his willingness to do stabilization. And this <br />is, as a kind of archeological work, what this does is it prevents further deterioration, at least for <br />a time. Like once the wall has started to collapse, then its very easy for stones to keep coming <br />out. The difficulty here, and then we have something that they do, that they can do now. The <br />difficulty with a full restoration is that Na Ala Hele program, theres not a lot of point to doing <br />100 feet; and the Na Ala Hele program is apparently not ready to open up the Judd Trail. If this <br />were a big development where you would, like the Mauna Lani or something where you have an <br />entity there, that you can put a condition on that they can do it later, thats a little easier. When <br />you have a small development thats going to get sold off, youll have a homeowners <br />association; but its difficult to have a condition that they do something in the distant future that <br />may never arrive. But what I would suggest -- if, you know, in where youre going with this as <br />far as what work could reasonably be done at this stage on the site -- would be to talk about <br />requiring stabilization of the portion that is within their metes, within the metes and bounds of <br />their property. <br />LAU:We would be amenable to that. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:You were speaking before on the metes and bounds going up to the, <br />essentially the mauka elevation of your property. Are you in a position where you could do the <br />stabilization to the mauka elevation boundary of your property? To me, that would feel more <br />appropriate than just what fits within the metes and bounds, as long as youre legally capable of <br />doing that. <br />LAU:Well, as I stated at the previous meeting, the problem that we would have <br />is that we would need permission from somebody else. I mean, we dont, we cannot do work on <br />property we dont own. So, plus, in this area, according to Mr. Moore, the Trail has been <br />bulldozed prior to 1980, so theres really nothing to stabilize it in that area. <br />9EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.