My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TRoyal_Alii
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:59:15 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:59:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANAB:I have a question. Seeing as it takes so long to have a survey actually <br />conducted, would a site visit help you in deciding? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita? Commissioner Graham? Commissioner <br />Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Well, I suppose. But I think I would need someone with Mr. Tylers kind <br />of knowledge, you know, of the area. Cause, you know, my looking at a bunch of bushes and <br />piles of rocks, I dont know how beneficial that would be. But, sure, Im open to that if theres <br />someone knowledgeable about the Judd Trail. <br />WATANABE:What about yourself, Mr. Graham? Cause it doesnt appear that we have <br />the votes to get this through today; and, at the same time, I would remind you that, you know, we <br />also have to consider the fairness to the applicant. And, you know, with the current state of the <br />economyandthewayitssodifficulttogetasurveydone,maybeacondition,awell-worded <br />condition will be sufficient if a site visit would satisfy much of your concerns. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Im not so concerned about, you know, the situation on the ground. Im <br />sure if the applicant just took some photos or something I would rest assured in their <br />representations. So a site visit is helpful and fine; and I personally am willing to go with that as <br />well as just -. To me we need a months time to go over what we have, and even some photos <br />from the applicant would be good enough for me, but a site visit would probably be better. And <br />Im okay with that as opposed to waiting for an official metes and bounds. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Galdones or Commissioner Salavea, you have anything to <br />add to this discussion? <br />SALAVEA:Im inclined to postpone acting on this only because there seems to be a <br />discrepancy, like Commissioner Iwashita had described. And a site visit, my opinion a site visit <br />for me would not be as useful because I wouldnt know what I was looking at. I would need to <br />depend upon community members, people who live in the area who have family ties, who have <br />the history, and they can relay that information relative to what the applicant was saying. And <br />that really for me is what this boils down to. Its what the local community members who have <br />been born and raised in the area have and know relative to what is being represented in the <br />application. If it doesnt correspond or jive, then I have an issue with it. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Sounds like, Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Chair. In fairness to the applicant, if the Commission is <br />going to decide to postpone or continue this hearing, I think we should continue it for the <br />purposes of getting information that would help us make a decision. The site visit thought, if its <br />not going to satisfy Commissioner Grahams or Commissioner Iwashitas concerns then perhaps <br />some other suggestions should be made so that they would get the information theyre going to <br />need to make a decision. <br />22EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.