My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 Planning Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:59:45 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:59:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of the right-of-way. He added Mr. FukeÓs correspondence to Mr. Van Pernis clearly indicates <br />there would only be a settlement agreement if there is a universal settlement. Mr. Tsukazaki, at <br />this time, asked the First Vice-Chairman to not let Mr. Van Pernis interrupted him as he was just <br />trying to correct the record. <br />In response to Mr. HeimanÓs concern that large buses will bring large crowds, Mr. Tsukazaki <br />noted the permit condition limits the total number of visitors per day to 80, and the large bus <br />evidence indicates it could carry 55 to 60 people. He said the incident about the Labor Day <br />illustrates one of the difficulties they have where as the tours are arranged by other companies <br />his client does not have prior knowledge of the tour. <br />Regarding the concerns of Ms. Heiman and Mr. Krueger, Mr. Tsukazaki said the 55 decibel <br />reading condition imposed upon Doutor is a residential decibel, whereas the neighborÓs <br />agricultural level is 70; and that it was DoutorÓs understanding that the decibel level pertains to <br />any sound coming from the operations relating to sales and tours. <br />Mr. Tsukazaki, at this time, informed the Commission of its intent to resubmit a more accurate <br />request at a later date. <br />In response to the inquiries of Mr. Tyler and Mr. Krueger, Mr. Yuen clarified that since no one <br />has made any motions and there is no interest by the Commission in entertaining the request <br />made by the applicant, there is nothing further for the Commission to do on this agenda item. <br />The First Vice-Chairman stated the public testimony and the hearing on this item have been <br />closed as no motions were made. <br />At 5:24 p.m., the Commission took up the following matter: <br />PRESENTATION ON KONA CIRCULATION PLAN AND ROADWAY ISSUES - <br />Mr. Hayashi noted as the Deputy Planning Director had to return to Hilo, this matter will be <br />deferred to a later date. He added that copies of the plan have been distributed to the <br />Commission (SEE EXHIBIT E). <br />ADMINISTRATIVEThe following were discussed under administrative <br />MATTERSmatters: <br />Ako/Anjo v. Vipassana Hawaii Meditation CenterÓs Permit Î Mr. Masuda said the Hawaii <br />Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorary. <br />Appeal of Ako Anjo v. Watkins/SunderlandÓs Permit Î Mr. Masuda said the parties will not ask <br />for oral argument and the Court will rule on just what were subm <br />Businesses Functioning Without Permits Î In response to Commissioner KubotaÓs inquiry, <br />Mr. Yuen strongly advised the Commissioners against getting involved in the enforcement <br />aspect of filing complaints on businesses that are functioning without permits, noting a <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.