My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:00:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I might, you know, I should mention from the standpoint of the Commission that, you know, you <br />do see most of the things that come before you with a favorable recommendation. Many of the <br />things that we disapprove of, you know, when we meet with people at the Planning Department <br />and we make clear that we would not support it, many of those do not result in formal <br />applications. Very often the things that youre seeing are things that had a degree of work done <br />on them between the applicant and the Department by the time they get there. So I would say, <br />no, that just the fact that this is Rural instead of Important Ag would not imply that a request for <br />rezoning of a 2-acre lot to a 1-acre zoning would be supported. <br />ALAMEDA:Follow-up? <br />IWASHITA:My feeling is we should be going the other way, is that because this is <br />Important Ag land designation, that the State Land Use Map should be changed; and it shouldnt <br />be Urban, it should be a more appropriate State Land Use designation. And I really think its <br />goingthewrongway.And,youknow,ifthechangesmadeessentiallyapermanentchangeand, <br />you know, if theres going to be changes in the Department and, you know, if 10-15-20 years <br />from now somebody comes in -- you know, all these other kinds of considerations that I agree <br />will have to be taken into consideration may be different. And, you know, my hunch is that at <br />some point theres going to be, you know, a good argument to have approved a 1-acre kind of <br />subdivision in this area, you know. And if we dont make the change, then that basically <br />precludes that from happening, right? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Mr. Director, you know, obviously, there seems to be some concern about <br />additional development and maybe higher density in this area. But Im wondering if you could <br />comment on the availability of water in this area because I dont believe that development would <br />occur if we dont have potable water, yeah? <br />YUEN:Well, it would be hard, we would oppose a rezoning without it. I cant tell <br />you off the top of my head whether water would be available for additional meters in the area. <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners, we do have three testifiers today. And I would <br />like to move forward with that, Mr. Director, if thats okay with you? <br />YUEN:Sure. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Well have time to discuss again and take action today on each of <br />these items. Let me call up Brenda Ford, Margaret Wille and Dore Dokos-Loewenthal. You can <br />be seated. Ill swear you in. Please raise your right hand. Thank you. Do you swear or affirm <br />to tell the truth now before the Hawai i County Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS:Yes. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. And could you please state your name and address for the <br />record? <br />FORD:Brenda Ford, 81-950 Makahiki Lane, Capt. Cook, Hawai i. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.