My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:00:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
do an Interim Amendment that would put those roads on the facilities map. Theyre not <br />currently shown and theres no interim amendments that affect those. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham, follow-up? <br />GRAHAM:In the last sentence you said there --. So is that something you will be <br />doing in the near future then, assuming this report comes back the way you think it will? <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />YUEN:And theres one thing that came up in the testimony and theres a point of <br />misunderstanding of the General Plan, that where people say that Rural allows subdivision down <br />to9,000squarefeet.Thereasonthattheresamentionof9,000squarefeetinthedescriptionof <br />Rural in the General Plan is that we took Rural to encompass a lot of non-conforming <br />subdivisions that were granted in the 50s and 60s. The problem with the previous General Plan <br />was that these were simply not shown as rural communities on the General Plan. So a place like <br />Ocean View or Hawaiian Paradise Park which are major, becoming major population centers, <br />were shown as Orchards on the General Plan. Many of these subdivisions were as small as 9,000 <br />square feet. Ainaloa Subdivision, for example, although its in the State Land Use Agricultural <br />District, most of the lots are about 9,000 square feet. So this statement is a descriptive statement <br />rather than, its a description of what is there rather than a prescriptive statement, a statement of <br />what you should do in the future. And thats why theres this additional statement in there that <br />the Rural designation does not necessarily imply subdivision or rezoning to allow lot sizes <br />smaller than already exists in the area covered by Rural. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: As a follow-up to that comment, you know, I understand what youre <br />saying. But, so what would we consider for the record, you know, a minimum size in a Rural <br />going forward? <br />YUEN:Thatll be decided at the zoning level. The General Plan itself does not <br />have a minimum lot size in Rural. You would do it on a zoning level. <br />WATANABE: But we havent formulated that yet, that guideline? <br />YUEN:No, no. <br />ALAMEDA:Other questions, Fellow Commissioners, before we start taking action on <br />these amendments? We have eight amendments that Id like to take action today. I believe <br />weve covered from north, east, south to west in terms of perspective and opinion on this <br />particular amendment. So Id like to just ask that maybe we take action and just simply let your <br />vote be your perspective, at this point. Could I entertain a motion for A-1? <br />YUEN:Let me just mention for the record one thing that all these map <br />amendments have corresponding text amendments that weve not talked about, but theyre just in <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.