2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the text of the General Plan that mentions the map changes. Just so that you should, as you vote on these, well just take it as understood that that includes the corresponding text changes. ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:As a little preface, I think Commissioner Watanabe indicated before that hed like to see us do something or support something in this Puna District towards allowing commercial development. And what were doing is making a recommendation to the Council; and they will, in fact, you know, fine tune it however comes out. My sense is that when I look at what the Planning Director is recommending as opposed to what the Orchidland Community Association is recommending that the Orchidland Drive A-2 is, I would, say more coherent, more consistent with the Community Association than the Ainaloa Boulevard one. So, as Im trying to reach a middle ground on it, I think I would tend to vote, to want to vote out the Ainaloa Boulevard one and vote in the Orchidland one. So in that respect I would move that we deletetheAinaloaBoulevardA-1itemfromourrecommendationtotheCountyCouncil. IWASHITA:Second. ALAMEDA:MotionmadebyCommissionerGraham,secondedbyCommissioner Iwashita. Discussion? Seeing none, staff? Or do we need clarification on the motion? Im looking at Commissioner Watanabe or Commissioner Galdones. Do we need clarification on the motion or -? WATANABE: No, I understand the motion. ALAMEDA:Okay. All right. Staff? HAYASHI:From staffs standpoint, my understanding is that youre not supporting the Planning Directors recommendation relative to A-1. Is that correct? ALAMEDA:Correct. HAYASHI:Okay. Thank you. With that, Ill call the roll call vote. Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Aye. HAYASHI:Commissioner Iwashita? IWASHITA:Yes. HAYASHI:CommissionerSalavea? SALAVEA:Aye. HAYASHI:Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE: Nay. 19