My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-26 TGP_Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:00:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:No. <br />HAYASHI:Chair Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:No. <br />HAYASHI:Mr. Chair, motion does not carry. The vote was three ayes and three noes. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Care to entertain a motion for A-2? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Consistently with what Ive said before, I would move that we include A-2 <br />inourrecommendationasproposedbythePlanningDirector.Andthepartthatwasalittle <br />th <br />contentious to me was including extra space along 35 <br /> Avenue. But as I believe the Planning <br />Directors recommendation that any zoning level changes would require that the Applicant <br />th <br />improve 35 Avenue is sufficient to support the rezoning, Im willing to go along with the <br />Planning Directors recommendation. So I move that A-2 be putforth with a positive <br />recommendation to the County Council. <br />WATANABE: Second. <br />ALAMEDA:Motion made by Commissioner Graham, seconded by Commissioner <br />Watanabe. Discussion? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />th <br />IWASHITA: Just, I think Orchidland Community Associations concern about 35 <br />th <br />Avenue and allowing commercial development at 35 and Orchidland Drive is not limited to, <br />th <br />you know, the condition of 35 Avenue at that intersection. And I guess their concern would <br />extend beyond, you know, far beyond the boundaries of whats being proposed and to how, you <br />th <br />know, people would then within the subdivision be using 35 Avenue more to access those <br />particular areas. And I dont think that whats being contemplated, in terms of requiring <br />th <br />improvements for 35 Avenue, would extend beyond the boundaries of the proposed <br />developments. So I think Orchidland Community Associations concern is warranted. And <br />basically they have a current infrastructure concern as to the condition of the roads and the <br />organizations potential liability with increased use, so I cant support the proposed expansion. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you for your opinion. Other discussion items or perspectives? <br />Seeing none, staff? <br />HAYASHI:Thank you, Mr. Chair. The motion is to support the Planning Directors <br />recommendation on map change A-2. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Aye. <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.