My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-05-27 TBLASMAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 3:10:34 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 3:10:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK:Okay. Thank you. Now did, in your various field work <br />property, did you find any evidence of cultural deposits, or remains, or archaeological <br />features, or anything of that nature intact on the property? <br />RECHTMAN:No. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. And did you find any evidence of any kind of tra <br />other physical on the ground evidence that the property was used as a means of <br />connecting one historical complex to another? <br />RECHTMAN:No. <br />VITOUSEK:And did your research disclose whether there is any remnant of a <br />trail connecting the Keolonhihi and Keakealaniwahine complexes? <br />RECHTMAN:Well, there have been archaeological studies done on adjacent <br />parcels, particularly the parcel to the south. I believe it's owned by Pocobo -. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. <br />RECHTMAN:Who was an earlier party to this. And, again, looking at the <br />Keolonhihi and Keakealaniwahine historical complexes map, the archaeological work <br />that was done before does show a trail, and you can see remnants of it. It's indicated on <br />this map by a double line running mauka-makai, perhaps from the <br />complex straight down to the Keolonhihi complex, which given other testimony about <br />the nature of this area being called pu`u, which I think was given before, would make <br />sense that people skirted around the hill rather than going up and over it. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. Now, Dr. Rechtman, you are familiar, I assume, w <br />historical complexes located in the same area as the subject property, is that correct? <br />RECHTMAN:Yes. <br />VITOUSEK:And to your knowledge, are those sites of cultural significance? <br />RECHTMAN:Yes. <br />VITOUSEK:And how would you grade the cultural significance of those sites <br />relative to the other sites in the area, in the region? <br />RECHTMAN:Extremely culturally significant. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. And so in your evaluation of the subject property, your <br />evaluation took into consideration the extreme historical or very high historical and <br />cultural significance of the adjoining properties, is that correct? <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.