Laserfiche WebLink
Applicant is saying will provide some mitigation, the types of landscaping that theyÓre <br />using. So that kind of, in my mind, puts me in a, makes me question how would those <br />impacts be addressed then. <br />GIFFIN:Mikahala? <br />M. ROY:In addition to what was shared by Maile David, with the e <br />that has been presented, including the model, the discussion for landscaping and so forth, <br />and, I repeat, for mitigative effort, I, too, agree that I feel that this is an important part of <br />understanding the application in full, especially when it comes to manners in which the <br />land will be affected, with what plants, that it does play a part. I am missing the <br />opportunity to hear this and to cross-examine. <br />GIFFIN:Mr. Vitousek? <br />VITOUSEK:I guess what IÓd like to ask is, you know, it appears weÓre going to <br />have a couple of days of hearing here and it appears weÓre going to go on to July, you <br />know. And so what I would ask -. You know, we submitted written testimonies. ItÓs not <br />like, you know, weÓre trying to pull some surprise or pull something out. So what I <br />would ask is just that if weÓre able to get the testimony on landscaping that we be allowed <br />to offer it out of order and that, you know, that the Commission determine at the close of <br />the case, you know, what the status of it is. In other words, IÓd like the opportunity to <br />submit evidence and testimony, subject to cross-examination. We <br />time in this hearing. And, so, I think that the Commission could decide that, for the time <br />being, itÓs not accepting the written testimony but that, you know -. IÓve made the <br />request to offer that witness or offer that testimony out of order; and this is a matter we <br />can clean up at the close of the case. And the ruling for the time being is just that, you <br />know, the claimant is, IÓm sorry, the Applicant is closing their case without Fielding <br />SchultzÓs written testimony having been accepted into evidence because he wasnÓt here <br />for cross-examination and, then, you know, could just leave my r <br />of order pending until a time when I can offer him. You know, I think thatÓs a fair way of <br />approaching it. <br />ISHADO:Madam Chair? <br />GIFFIN:One minute, Mr. Ishado, do you foresee that you will be a <br />him to come at a later date? <br />VITOUSEK:I sure hope so. I know itÓs important. <br />GIFFIN:We do, too. <br />VITOUSEK:Yeah. <br />GIFFIN:Mr. Ishado? <br />4 <br /> <br />