|
an aerial photo taken in 1976 just after an event that occurred, an earthquake, that apparently
<br />there was subsidence in this area which created a drop of approximately 10 inches. It shows,
<br />again, you have Kapoho Vacationland identified here. Wai Opae Road with several dwellings
<br />located both on the mauka and the makai section. If I was to kind of give you a general area
<br />where we’re looking at it would be approximately in this area.
<br />This is a subdivision map. All these exhibits are located within your packets. They can be
<br />th
<br />addressed there. This is, this was taken on May 29 of 1962 and it does identify the shoreline at
<br />that time, and as well as the ponds in the area. Again, for reference we have Wai Opae Road and
<br />the general location of the application. When a Special Management Area Assessment is
<br />submitted near the shoreline or along the shoreline the Planning Department requests that a
<br />certified shoreline survey be submitted with that. The Planning Director can waive the
<br />submission of that if he feels it‘s not relevant to the situation.In this particular case there have
<br />been problems in the Kapoho Vacationland for a period of time where DLNR, the Department of
<br />Land and Natural Resources, has not certified, has shoreline surveys that were submitted. And
<br />so to be able to resolve this dilemma the Planning Director had allowed topographical maps to be
<br />submitted along with the assessments showing, I believe, a tide of 2.8 feet. And in this particular
<br />application this was done. This is a topographical map that was submitted on June 12,2006
<br />along with the application. Again, it was done at a later time on August 12, 2006. This may be
<br />incorrect, it might have been 2007, but I’ll reference that after we’re done here.
<br />This is a plot plan that we showed at the site inspection. Again, it shows Wai Opae Road down
<br />at the lower portion of the map. We have the single family dwelling identified here with a bridge
<br />coming across to the rear portion of the property and an office that the applicants propose to
<br />construct. It does identify the pond in the area. Again, this was, we were able to conduct the site
<br />inspection to about this area and be able to witness the ponding on the property.
<br />The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission affirm his decision to
<br />require a shoreline certificate be submitted along with this assessment application. Before I
<br />finish the presentation I wanted to bring to your attention that we have received quite a number
<br />th
<br />of submittals since our last hearing. We have received a submittal dated May 30 from the
<br />applicants which has a number of exhibits attached to it. Additionally, we’ve received a letter
<br />th
<br />dated May 29 from Thomas Young, and this was passed out to the Commission. The Planning
<br />Department has also added an addendum to the background and recommendation which has
<br />three colored photos submitted along with those. These photos are shown on the board here.
<br />These were taken on December 29, 2007. This shows the applicant’s property. It shows the
<br />water in this particular area. Apparently there was a storm event that occurred on this particular
<br />day. At the site inspection we did ask where these porta potties were located on the property and
<br />we identified that; and the reason for that was to be able to show the location for these photos,
<br />again, December 29, 2007 photo, and then also one taken on December 30, 2007. Additionally
<br />this morning we have received quite a number of correspondence from the applicant, if I can just
<br />briefly address those. These appear to be, majority appear to be support letters. One is from
<br />Jewels De Loach and Myk Ahl, I don’t see a date on this one, Robert Emery, again, dated May
<br />th
<br />30, Roberta Brashear-Kaulfers, June 4, 2008, David Deweese and Earl Dirgo and that’s dated
<br />June 4, 2008. We have a portion of the Shoreline Setback Rules, Rule 11-5 on and it also has a
<br />portion of 11-5 on the second page. We have a letter from Eric Schott and we have a letter dated
<br />December 19, 2006 from George Young, oh, I’m sorry, this is from the Planning Department to
<br />George Young of the Department of Army, US Army Engineer District and, again, dated
<br />3
<br />
<br />
|