My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-06 TPUNAcdp
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-06 TPUNAcdp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:02:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: Okay, thank you. So do we have any further questions of the <br />presenters? No? I think the three hours wore us out. <br />SIRACUSA: Just one question. <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />SIRACUSA: Sorry. We’ve gotten an assortment of comments, some of which <br />asked us to go back to the drawing board and use the Kona Plan as a model, some of <br />which asked us to only pass this as a resolution instead of an ordinance, and some of <br />which asked us to rewrite the whole thing; and I would like to hear your comments on <br />those. <br />BROWN: I’ll start. I’ve heard the same thing, obviously, and from my <br />perspective the Puna conditions and the Kona conditions are very different. We have <br />similar problems but the existing situation is the elephant in the room for Puna. As we’ve <br />all heard many times is we have over 50,000 plus building sites in the district already <br />with no planned infrastructure, no water, very limited public roadway system - almost all <br />of the roads are private. As has been said a number of times before, most of the lots in <br />Puna were really never intended to be built and lived on. They were intended to just be <br />sold and resold over and over and over again. But as we’re finding out now, more and <br />more people are finding that for one reason or another that’s a good place to live, or what <br />they can afford, you know, to go build on and to live there; and some of us really like it. <br />Kona is in a situation where they can do a more detailed planning effort based on their <br />transient-oriented districts or developments. These pods are on a mid-level corridor that <br />they’ve identified; and they can do that in coordination with future subdivisions in that <br />district, and they have the room to do that. In Puna, Hawaiian Paradise Park covers from <br />Highway 130 all the way to the sea. So, and if you go mauka of there you’d have the <br />other subdivisions. And, so how do you get any alternate roadway to Highway 130 to <br />service the people of, especially in Puna Makai, you know, the lower Puna area? So we <br />have a very different situation there. And within the context of the CDP it didn’t seem <br />quite practical to try to go, do the level of detailed planning necessary for each one of the <br />village or town centers that is being criticized. And we didn’t do that, as it is that is being <br />done in Kona. I agree with some of the critics of that failure in the plan to do that, that <br />that needs to be done at those local community levels; and that is what the plan needs to <br />probably say more clearly. But that is the intention in the plan, is that there will be these <br />local planning efforts to do a master plan for Pahoa town, for Kea‘au town, and for <br />Hawaiian Paradise Park. The other subdivision village centers or neighborhood centers <br />may not need extensive community planning efforts like the big ones. They may just <br />need to agree and make it possible to happen on a certain piece of land and adopt a <br />zoning designation that’s appropriate for their particular village center or neighborhood <br />center. <br />SIRACUSA: Mr. Chairman? <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.