Laserfiche WebLink
an Industrial area? I don’t think you can have, you know, a designated Industrial area every <br />three or four miles. Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: I’m thinking about all of those vacant lots on that street who I’m sure <br />some of those are absentee landowners. And they may not even be aware that there are already <br />these industrial uses on the block, and yet I know there are lots of people out there who hold on <br />to parcels for a long time waiting until things change in their lives on the mainland and they can <br />move over here and build their retirement home. And so I think that the first indication that <br />some of them will get about this, all of this, is when they receive the survey letter. And I would <br />feel a lot more comfortable about approving this, albeit with conditions, if I knew that the lot <br />owners said that’s okay, you know. Because they have their investments, they’ve been paying <br />property taxes on those lots for all those years, and I think they should be allowed to weigh in on <br />it. So my feeling right now would be I would feel a lot more comfortable instead of approving <br />this motion would be to say let’s continue this, let’s get a chance to get the responses, and then <br />come back and look at it, because then we’ll have, one way or the other, we’ll have a public <br />mandate. <br />WATANABE: Ms. Bowman, you want to respond to that? <br />BOWMAN: I just have a question. The applicant is required to notify surrounding -? <br />WATANABE: Yes, for 500 feet. <br />BOWMAN: Five hundred feet, okay, thank you. <br />WATANABE: But the survey that Mr. Yuen is speaking of encompasses the entire road, I <br />believe. Yeah, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN: Right. They have to notify within 500 feet which I just counted up as 15 <br />nd <br />lots owners, including -. Some of the lots would be on 32 actually within the 500-foot radius. <br />rd <br />We’re writing to all the lot owners on 33, which is 46 lots. I think it’s not 46 owners but it’s 46 <br />lots. <br />BOWMAN: I just think that, you know, this one applicant is kind of, you know, <br />between a rock and a hard place because of this, you know, waiting to hear back. My initial <br />question was, I know in the background it said that the Director should send a letter to the <br />people; and I don’t know when you talked about doing that. Because it just seems like, you <br />know, one was sent just a couple days ago before this came up. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, that was going to be my point. Because while I think having all of <br />the information is always nice, the fact is his lease expires I believe it was in October or <br />somewhere thereabouts, and when Shipman signs him to another lease they’re not going to sign <br />into a six-month lease or one year lease. They’re going to ask for a longer term, so then he’s <br />committed again. <br />BOWMAN: I understand. But I think my question was referring to page 3, it said that <br />rd <br />the Planning Director will make an effort to contact the owners of these 46 lots along 33 <br />Avenue to get their input. And my question is when was that proposed? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />23 <br /> <br />