My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-06-17 KPC REZ04-033 SMA04-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 4:21:38 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 4:21:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
tothisapplication was probably more extensive than any other notice Ive seen. The Kona <br />Billfisher Condominium is not next door but its about 144 feet away from the closest boundary. <br />And shortly before the last scheduled hearing last month we received a list of 780 property <br />owners, timeshare owners and we proceeded to send notice to each of those owners. And I can <br />tell you almost less than a dozen out of 780 lived in the State of Hawai i. They were all over the <br />United States, Canada and Internationally. And because it was so close to the last Commission <br />meeting we requested a time extension to allow any further comments to be fair to everybody. <br />And so we did get, the Commission did approve the continuance and we sent out yet another <br />notice about the continued hearing. And we also send out another map because as soon as <br />people received notices they started calling me, they started calling the Planning Department and <br />everybody thought this building was right next door. Most people that called, once they found <br />out it was not next door and that were not going to have a cabaret thats open till 2 in the <br />morning with wild loud music, were not opposed. I know you did received some letters of <br />opposition. But, if you note about some of the letters its because theyre still concerned about <br />loudnoise,theyrestillconcernedabouttheirviewsandIbelieveMr.Getmancanhelpexplain <br />so that the view should not adversely affect the Kona Billfisher. Kona Billfisher is almost the <br />same height as this building proposed its 43 feet high. So its about the same height but it is not <br />next door. In addition there were some Billfisher owners that came here today and saw the <br />renderings for the project and Mr. Nee talked to them and they were pleased and they left. So <br />weve tried the best we can to communicate with people about this project. Theyre trying to <br />design a project that would fit in to the Alii Drive, the Kailua Village area. And Mr. Getman will <br />also explain some more changes hes doing in design to accommodate some of the suggestions <br />the Kailua Village Design Commission also made. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Getman would you like to add to her statement? <br />GETMAN:Sure. Can you hear me okay? <br />GALDONES:We need to have you recorded. <br />GETMAN:Okay. If you note the designs, the exterior of the building. <br />HAYASHI:Would you like to come up here? <br />GETMAN:Yeah. When we met with the Village Commission in March they had a lot <br />of comments and concerns about the exterior materials and the architecture of the building. And <br />weve redesigned the entire exterior of the project in keeping more with the specific plan that is <br />in place in the Village. And weve changed the, weve made it more in keeping with the Village <br />theme. Weve broken up the roofs; originally it was a continuous line. Weve added gables and <br />more detail and changed the roof heights and varied the heights so there was concern about <br />looking too horizontal. We changed the balcony railing system to something more in keeping <br />with the residential project direct before it was just glass system. Weve added stone along the <br />retail fronts in here. And weve also broken up the roofs of the retail area down in this area. So <br />what weve done is trying to keep the project more in keeping with the concerns that we had, we <br />heard at the last meeting. Also the access to the project was changed significantly to a single <br />point at the other end, at this end which was previously explained. So and were continuing to <br />EXHIBIT E <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.