Laserfiche WebLink
future hookup with Kuakini Highway and that would be in this location along the south side of <br />the property. Again as far as condition E as a result of the Department of Public Works <br />recommendation which they are recommending that the condition be that only 1 vehicular access <br />be provide off of Alii Drive for the project site. That doesn€t include the loading area. We are <br />also requiring as recommended by the Department of Public Works that this frontage along the <br />Alii Drive be improved with curb gutters and sidewalk drainage improvements and excess uses <br />that would be required by the Department of Public Works. As far as the SMA Use Permit we <br />are also recommending approval and there is a proposed condition 4 and that would be under the <br />revised SMA recommendation dated- if you look at the top it says June 7, 05 and that is the latest <br />recommendation. We are recommending that, we€re actually deleting condition, proposed <br />condition 4 so condition 5 would be actually condition 4 etc. And that€s basically the condition 4 <br />that we had we had initially recommended so it states that the height limit of the structure shall <br />not exceed 45 feet. We felt that that was not necessary since the zoning height limit for this <br />particular area is in fact 45 feet so they wouldn€t be able to exceed that height limit anyway. <br />Therearesomeconcernsrelativetothemethodofcalculationoftheheightforthecurrentplans <br />that the Applicant and the Planning Department would still need to work out should this <br />application be granted. Related to these 2 application the Applicant has as I indicated earlier an <br />existing permit, SMA Permit. Existing permit number 276, which allowed a 48-unit <br />condominium project. Should this rezoning application be approved and a SMA application also <br />be approved then the Applicant is requesting that this permit be revoked. However the <br />revocation would be contingent upon them getting the rezoning, change of zone application by <br />the County Council. As far as the status of the existing SMA Use Permit 276 I would like today <br />to these conditions back in 1988 when the permit was originally approved the only time <br />condition was that they received Plan Approval within 2 years from the date of receipt of the <br />permit. They did receive time extension within the 2-year period so technically the application, I <br />mean the SMA Use Permit is still valid. Okay with that I€ll answer any questions you may have <br />regarding both the Change of Zone and the SMA Use Permit applications. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah Norm just a clarification. The Kona Billfisher is not immediately <br />adjacent to this there€s one lot between the two? <br />HAYASHI:Yes, there€s one lot between the Billfisher and, the Billfisher I believe is <br />this particular property, one of these, it€s one lot away from the subject property. <br />MCCALL:Okay, thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Norman, we€re still am I right requiring that the existing 12-inch main be <br />extended to that site? <br />HAYASHI:The existing 12? <br />WATANABE:12-inch water main? <br />EXHIBIT E <br />4 <br /> <br />