My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SMA-2023-000027)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-04-20 Leeward
>
Item #1 D&L Fujimoto LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000027)
>
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SMA-2023-000027)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2023 9:49:49 AM
Creation date
4/13/2023 9:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
4/1/2023
Related Permits
PL-SMA-2023-000027, SMA-77-000031, SMA 51,
Permit Number
PL-SMA-2023-000027
Parcel Number
750070330000
Description
PD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SMA-2023-000027)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As such, it is not uncommon to find establishments — be it private (like <br /> commercial buildings) or public (State or County buildings) assess a <br /> parking fee for use of the required parking. It should also be noted that <br /> some public establishments like the County Hale Halewai Park also <br /> restrict parking —whether by gates or chains —during certain hours. Even <br /> parking areas for public accesses are also subject to controls (Mauna Kea <br /> Beach, Hokulia, etc.) <br /> The point here is that required "public" parking does not mean "free" and <br /> unfettered 24/7 availability. The Zoning Code does not prohibit <br /> reasonable controls and restrictions_ The applicant, in this instance, is <br /> requesting the ability to exercise those kinds of controls that have been <br /> afforded to other public or private establishments. <br /> LEGITIMACY OF CONDITION: As noted earlier, the legal authority of <br /> such a condition could be questioned. That condition is unprecedented <br /> and designed to serve a public purpose without just compensation. Had <br /> the condition be imposed as part of a rezoning action, perhaps an <br /> argument justifying its imposition could have been made. However, the <br /> commercial/retail use was already deemed permitted. The condition was <br /> made part of a Special Management Area Use Permit, and a condition like <br /> "public parking" has to be related to the objectives and policies of the <br /> SMA. <br /> It is highly debatable whether the basic project has this public shoreline <br /> access implications that generate a need for public parking. Even if it did, <br /> please note that while coastal access public parking area requirement has <br /> been required of a number of projects, the condition has not precluded <br /> controls over its use, including time of use. <br /> Notwithstanding the questionable legality of the condition, the applicant is <br /> not taking issue with that. li so, it would have requested that the condition <br /> be stricken in its entirety. This argument is noted more for contextual <br /> purposes. The applicant will continue to make this area available as a <br /> public parking area with some measure of controls to address safety, <br /> maintenance, and availability to the general public. <br /> V. RELA T IONSHIP TO SMA POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES <br /> A. Recreational Resources <br /> The proposed improvements should not have any adverse impact to <br /> the recreational resources of the area. The property is not a coastal <br /> property, and there are intervening privately owned properties between <br /> the project site and the ocean. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.