Laserfiche WebLink
DEFRANCO: Thank you, so, we need a second for this. <br /> DELA CRUZ: Second. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay and seconded okay so, now we're open to discuss it. So, <br /> Commissioner Paishon-Duarte. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Thank you. I have a question for Deputy Director Darrow. Are we <br /> allowed to place a condition on this application to make sure that, I'm clearly hearing the reasons <br /> for wanting to have the option for short-term vacation rental. Are we allowed to place a condition <br /> to ensure that comes into compliance like to make sure that the applicant applies for that use <br /> moving forward. <br /> DARROW: Applies— <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: As a part to place a condition on as part of this application and I'm <br /> not fully aware of all of the requirements and the steps for someone to apply to run a short-term <br /> vacation rental. <br /> DEFRANCO: He already has one. <br /> DARROW: Yeah, if I could, and I briefly touched upon it earlier. There was <br /> only a very short window for somebody during the first round of rule changes for unhosted short- <br /> term vacation rentals. For somebody that was not located in a permitted zoning to be able to get <br /> what was called a non-conforming use certificate, a NUC. Once somebody receives that, then <br /> they have to renew every year and if the ownership changes the permit or the certificate can be <br /> transferred. So, this particular applicant had purchased the property with the certificate. So, <br /> there's nothing more that he needs to apply for or anything. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Thank you. <br /> DARROW: I could mention this that moving forward if the new rules are <br /> adopted that identify hosted rentals, then and the applicant lives there then they may have the same <br /> opportunity to apply for their primary residence and being able to host a room or two. And again, <br /> those are things yet unseen that we're working through. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Thank you. <br /> DARROW: Thank you. <br /> DEFRANCO: Any other questions or discussions please, Commissioner Vitousek? <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. I think this is a really interesting case. In that, this has <br /> been a standard practice in Puak6 for the last 20 plus years. Where historic homes are being <br /> demolished and a lot of better word mansions are being put in and there has been no SMA review <br /> 16 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />