My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-03-16 Leeward Exh A (Items 1 Frank Sirlin PL-SMA-2022-000024)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-03-16 Leeward
>
Sirlin (PL-SMA-2022-000024)
>
2023-03-16 Leeward Exh A (Items 1 Frank Sirlin PL-SMA-2022-000024)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2023 5:52:48 PM
Creation date
4/20/2023 5:52:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of that and in essence it's led to dismantling of a historic district. And this is the first time that I'm <br /> aware of that an application for an SMA has come in for Puak6. Is that the case for one of these <br /> lots? <br /> DARROW: In this particular rule change, yes. There has been some a little bit <br /> more north that were coming in that triggered when they built the second dwelling. <br /> VITOUSEK: Gotcha. <br /> DARROW: Yeah, remember we had the current rule required if they built that <br /> second dwelling, they'd have to come in. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br /> DARROW: But this is the first one coming in Puako that the first dwelling has to <br /> come in. <br /> VITOUSEK: And my understanding of the SMA guidelines is that cumulative <br /> impacts are one of the major components for review. I believe that's 205A-26 (2)(a). I think that <br /> if this rule had been in place back before it would be a much different Puako today. So, here we <br /> are where the majority of lots in Puako have already been affected by this change. I'm not sure <br /> how at this point we can mitigate any of that. I mean looking at it individually I would love to see <br /> more view planes from the road even though it's not a State highway. I think walling off the <br /> entire lot with a 6-foot wall and 6-foot gates is really closing off views of the shoreline and closing <br /> off the community. Whereas the whole community may not be a gated community but the <br /> construction of these walls and gates and giant houses that block everything off create a corridor <br /> where only the individual people who owns these oceanfront properties are able to enjoy the ocean <br /> and the view of the ocean. I think it has a pretty significant change on the community. I don't <br /> know how to address that with one application. <br /> KNOWLES: I concur Chair Vitousek and that is the struggle that I am also having <br /> because I think that this idea of cumulative environmental impact as set forth in the statute has <br /> been narrowly construed quite frankly to be considering sort of like the impact on the water or as <br /> opposed to the impact on the entire environment of the community. It was very interesting to me <br /> that the applicant noted his desire to live in a Hawaiian neighborhood when in my experience <br /> Puako doesn't look like that anymore and these mansions do begin to change the environmental <br /> character of the community. I guess my question for you, Mr. Darrow, is just this idea of you <br /> spoke to it but at what point I can't locate the tipping point for when the character of a community <br /> changes so much that it is now in effect a gated community. And what our power is as a <br /> Commission to really consider that as we review these SMA permits that are really looking at the <br /> entire ocean and front environment. <br /> DARROW: Thank you. It's not an easy question to answer and in this particular <br /> case I think we're looking at probably the most, I mean, I don't want to belittle this. This is one <br /> single-family dwelling. What we normally look at for a cumulative effect is like a resort complex <br /> that comes in like Waikoloa or Mauna Lani or Kukio, Ka`upulehu and they come in for one SMA <br /> 17 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.