2004-06-18 TFABYONIC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SPRINGER:Just to Corporation Counsel, with regard to Mr. Matsukawas concern about his clients untimely filing, has the Corporation Counsel had a chance to hear Mr. Matsukawas concern about notification? OTOOLE:Yes. Well, I dont know when they were notified, when he was notified. I mean, I think what was submitted regarding that, I thought maybe Mr. Vitousek can clear that up. But I would think everyone had been notified at the same time in the same mailing, but I dont know that. VITOUSEK:You know, if you listen to what Mr. Matsukawa said he said that hed heard representation from Mr. Addario that he hadnt picked up or hadnt seen it. He didnt say when it was, I mean, it was mailed with all the other notices; and thats what the rule requires. And, so, and I just frankly dont know if its something you can waive.So,andourpositionis,really,itsuptotheCommissiontodecide. FUJIKAWA:Youunderstand,Mr.Vitousek? SPRINGER:Ido.Dowetakethisupnoworafterweveheardfromallof them? FUJIKAWA:I think we have to hear from everybody. OTOOLE:Well, its up to you, but I think -. FUJIKAWA:We want to take it now? OTOOLE:Well consider each application separately. Up to you. FUJIKAWA:Okay. Lets go to Dr. Kimball. VITOUSEK:Mr. Chairman, may I ask a question first? FUJIKAWA:Yeah, go ahead. VITOUSEK:I was confused. Mr. Matsukawa, I believe, said he represented Kimball, McGann and the Puako Community Association, and then Mr. Kimball said he represented Nann Hylton. So I dont know that Mr. Kimball can represent another party. Shes not here, and I didnt hear Mr. Matsukawa say that he represented Nann Hylton. So -. OTOOLE:Yes, I think if Mr. Matsukawa is repre -, whatever party hes representing, I think he should speak for them, unless he needs to call them as witnesses. Well, I dont think that Mr. Kimball would be precluded or, from representing Ms. Hylton. 5