My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-06-18 TFABYONIC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-06-18 TFABYONIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:50:01 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:49:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MATSUKAWA:If its necessary, I would represent her because her request to <br />Dr. Kimball was that either he or I would represent her for today, in her absence. <br />OTOOLE:Okay, why dont you proceed, then. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. Clear? Its clarified? <br />OTOOLE:Well, Im asking Mr. Matsukawa to -. <br />MATSUKAWA:So I would represent her formally. Dr. Kimball can speak to her <br />concerns expressed in her petition. <br />OTOOLE:Yeah, but I dont know why hes putting down the mike if hes <br />going to speak on the other petitions. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Matsukawa? <br />MATSUKAWA:Okay. I think the other petitions are all self-explanatory, <br />Mr.Chairman,membersoftheCommission.Eachofthepetitionershasexpressedtheir <br />unique standing in that they live either across the street in the very near vicinity and <br />believe that they would be affected by the impacts of the project. The Community <br />Association, as the Commission knows, has a unique interest as well because it purports <br />to represent a number of people who live in the area and, therefore, will be advancing <br />their own concerns as to one or any of the various aspects of the projects impacts on <br />them. I think all of the requirements of standing have been met. Theyre each here and <br />are able to answer any questions that you may have to clarify any concerns. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. Lets go back to Dr. Kimball. You may proceed. <br />KIMBALL:You all, I believe, are in receipt of the letter that I filed with my, <br />for the petition. Ill just summarize briefly what I think are two pertinent issues which <br />would affect me personally and my family. One is that as we are just directly across the <br />street from the project and this project is in a flood zone that there is potential, as has <br />been stated in various government agencies, that flooding will occur; and I think that this <br />would have a direct negative impact on my property. <br />I also feel that along with the whole issue of the potential for the destruction of the reef, <br />the water quality issues, the fact that the water there moves freely back-and-forth is such <br />that my, our enjoyment of the ability to use the beach, as well as from the publics ability <br />to use the beach, could be seriously affected. <br />I would like to add one further issue. That is, as I am the safety officer for the Puako <br />Community Association, weve done a lot of work in the last few years on maintaining, <br />creating, providing an evacuation route in times of civil defense emergencies. And as <br />Ive noted in one of my last paragraphs that both the Police Department and the State <br />Civil Defense Agency have commented on the difficulties that could occur if there is a <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.