My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-06-18 TSMITH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-06-18 TSMITH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:50:09 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:50:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that, and we cant force them to do something that theyre unable todo,except along the <br />lines of the conditions. <br />I havent spoken with Mr. Clever since his application came forward. I have spoken with <br />his planning consultants. And I think Mr. Clever, given the real estate market, would be <br />quite wise to move forward withhisproject at this time. Theres a real need for it. <br />Anyhow, as I was thinking about the comments of the Commissioners, as well as the <br />public today, I just was reminded that whatever it is that you folks are called to do, <br />whatever there is that Im called to do as another, one of the public servants, it has to <br />meet a public purpose, and certainly not give further problems for the people that are <br />already residents here. <br />Now, with respect to Condition No. B -. And, by the way, Mr. Chairman, Ive had a <br />chancetoreviewtheBackgroundReport,theapplicationandtheRecommendationsof <br />the Director, I forget to mention that; and Ithank the staff for providing this to me in <br />advance. With respect to the proposed condition, Im speaking in this case to the rezone, <br />not the State Land Use Boundary Amendment. REZ 04-008, Condition B proposes that <br />the Applicants, this is a standard condition on State Land Use Ag lands. And I just want <br />to be sure that Mr. Yuen, all these folks will have, if they build a home theyll have to <br />sign that agreement, right, for a farm dwelling? Is that correct in this case? No, because <br />its going to Rural? <br />YUEN:No, yeah, because theres no farm dwelling requirement in Rural. <br />TYLER:Okay, so, really, Condition B, then, is not applicable since itll be <br />changed from a State Land Use Ag to a Rural? <br />YUEN:Well, theres still limitations on uses in the Rural District, so it still <br />applies; but it doesnt apply to the farm dwelling. <br />TYLER:But it doesnt, is there a limitation through HRS 205? <br />YUEN:Theres some limitations in HRS 205 to the Rural District, yes. <br />TYLER:Okay, good. All right. As for the Hualalai Vistas being gated, <br />they originally proposed this, but I told them I would not support any gated subdivision; <br />and so thats why the roads are public. And I think they finally saw that that was a good <br />thing to do. <br />Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, Condition No. D is an old condition. <br />This condition is not the current condition that you have been using; and I would draw <br />your attention to the Kabumoto rezoning which is contained in your Background Report <br />and which Condition No. E has the correct language. I would urge you to amend this to <br />use the correct language to include condominium property regimes. <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.