Laserfiche WebLink
improved, it will include sidewalk along one side so that people will be able to get back- <br />and-forth there without a problem there. <br />The other issue that I wanted to address was the comment about no water rights. <br />Obviously, there are water rights to the property that are adequate for the existing <br />subdivision. And the proposal is conditioned upon us being able to satisfy the <br />Department of Water Supplys concerns for water in that area, so not a problem. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay, any other, any questions, Commissioners, with both these <br />gentlemen, the Applicant? If not -. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead, Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Aside from the extension of Kakahiaka, will the internal roads be <br />user-friendlyforbicyclesandpedestrians? <br />BROOKS:Thatiscorrect,yes.And,also,Idliketopointout,too,that,one <br />other comment that was made by Mr. Gimpel. It was not necessarily addressed but I, and <br />Bruce Wichert is here in the audience. When the traffic study was done, it did take into <br />consideration the traffic at the Queen K intersection. All that was analyzed. So if there <br />are specific questions about that, those could be addressed to Mr. Wichert. <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead, Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Am I looking at a representation of the internal traffic, or where <br />may I find that? <br />BROOKS:That map that youre looking at there is for the Lokahi Makai and <br />Mauka. Thats for the PUD that Mr. Darrow was addressing earlier. <br />SPRINGER:You have anything of yours? <br />BROOKS:Im sorry? Hannah? <br />SPRINGER:Is there anything representing the internal traffic flow, just whats <br />up there? <br />BROOKS:Just up there. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Any question, Commissioners? Your decision -. Do we have a <br />motion to accept -? Were looking at SLU 04-001. <br />18 <br /> <br />