My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-20 TKONAHEIGHTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-20 TKONAHEIGHTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:54:19 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:54:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTA: Well, yeah, that will come later. We actually filed the <br />application for the two, you know, about the same time; but because that one went to the <br />State Land Use Commission, they asked us to do some additional studies on arthropods and <br />some additional economic impact studies. So we ended up doing some further studies and <br />that’s what delayed that application. So we are still finishing up those revisions and <br />additional studies, so that we can re-file it. <br />BOWMAN: So – I’m sorry – but your affordable housing would be on the <br />kind of L-shaped parcel, and the County park? <br />ATTA: Yes. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. <br />RHO: Other questions? Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Has there been any action taken on <br />the boundary amendment by the Council already, or is it too soon? <br />YUEN: I think we suggested to the Council that they not act on it until <br />the rezone came up simply because rather than Council – a lot of the same issues will come <br />up at the same time – rather than look at the project twice, wait for the rezone to come <br />through. <br />LIM: And we also will be submitting a letter to the Council to <br />request the deferral until the Commission acts and submits their recommendations on these <br />matters also. <br />DOMINGO: I can see the logic on that, but by the same token, you know, <br />having have to entertain the application for the SMA Permit, I think it’s contingent upon <br />what the result of the zoning bill will be because they may impose certain conditions on the <br />rezoning bill, which will then impact the SMA Permit application we have before us, and <br />probably would have to be amended or reconsidered by the applicant. <br />RHO: Director Yuen, would you like to respond? <br />YUEN: Well, the recommendation on the Permit is written so that it <br />only takes effect if the rezoning is passed by the Council. It is true that if the Council does <br />something with the rezoning that’s inconsistent with the version of the SMA Permit that’s in <br />here, if they passed the rezoning but, say, limited it to a certain number of units or had some <br />other kinds of conditions, it’s possible that the SMA Permit would have to be redone. <br />BOWMAN: I just have a quick question. And that area there is -, what is <br />the LUPAG? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.