My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-07-01 THI JOHNS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-07-01 THI JOHNS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:59:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:59:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
refer it to the State Land Use Commission, then other items on the agenda which would require a <br />similar action by the Planning Commission would then also be referred to the State Land Use <br />Commission for some interpretation or their opinion? <br />HAYASHI: No. I think what we need to do is, first of all, check with the State Land <br />Use Commission as to what the actual definition of Important Ag Land is. Once the <br />determination has been made, then we can say that, okay, whenever an application comes in and <br />it fits within this category of being Important Ag Land, then any approval by this Planning <br />Commission would be forwarded to the State Land Use Commission for their approval; and it’s <br />only for approval recommendations. If the Planning Commission at this level denies this <br />particular petition or any other petition under similar situation, it would be a denial. <br />DOMINGO: So if this Commission recommends approval of this petition and the <br />Commission would make a decision as to no effect, then it will come back to the Planning <br />Department or the Commission for further consideration? <br />GONZALEZ: If I may -. Okay, so if I may step in at this point. So, Commissioner <br />Domingo, is your question basically if this section is triggered we cannot outright approve, we <br />conversely cannot outright deny? Is that what you’re trying to say? <br />DOMINGO: Well, that’s my interpretation right now. That’s how I look at it. <br />GONZALEZ: Okay, I can, well, if we can take a recess, I’ll go look it up, because I think <br />that’s a valid question. I kind of have an idea of what is applicable here but I just want to make <br />sure. So -. <br />WOODWARD: Break time, ten minutes. <br />RECESSED The Chair called a recess at 10:31 a.m. <br />RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 10:41 a.m. <br />WOODWARD: All right, will the Planning Commission please come back to order. <br />Mr. Gonzalez, I believe you have, got some research for us. <br />GONZALEZ: I believe the Department has clarified for us that the Planning Commission <br />has the final authority to deny special permits. Only in cases where it involves this section of the <br />Statute, if they decide to approve such action, they do not have final authority to approve. It has <br />to be forwarded. So they can deny outright. But if they approve, they don’t have final authority <br />to approve, they have to get it ratified by the Land Use Commission. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Discussion? Commissioner Ogata. <br />OGATA: I’m ready to make a motion. <br />11 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.