Laserfiche WebLink
MOOERS:On the background report and recommendation we€re in complete <br />accordance with the Department and believe that the conditions as recommended adequately <br />address the concerns that need to be addressed, particularly in relationship to the pond and pond <br />management. I would like to point out that we do have in addition to the people that are table, <br />Dr. Bob Rechtman who did the archaeology and cultural assessment for site; and Dr. Ron Terry <br />did the botanical and pond site, so he€ll be able to talk about Army Corps issues and the biology <br />of the ponds. So hopefully we have everybody here necessary to address the concerns that may <br />be raised. I would like to point out that obviously the key elements of this application is the <br />significance of this pond; and we spent considerable time discovering when the pond was <br />created, how that property has been used since the pond was created in the late 1920s, what was <br />taking place on the property. We have worked with the Army Corps of Engineers on what is <br />proposed to be done with the property, and we feel very confident that we can address all the <br />issues that you folks may have today. So if I€m not able to answer the question, I think we have <br />people here who can. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. Do we have any questions of the applicant? Commissioner <br />Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. There was one thing I found a little bit confusing when I was <br />reading about the pond. First of all, there€s a smaller pond and then there€s a larger pond, and <br />although they are connected, yeah, there€s a difference in water salinity. And yet I understand <br />that there€s an awful lot of sediment on the bottom which is blocking, it€s keeping them from <br />being anchialine ponds. Is there no underground connection to the ocean, or has that sediment, is <br />the sediment blocking connections to the ocean completely, or, and do you folks intend to <br />remove the sediment so that the ponds can flush out naturally? Is that part of the plan? Could <br />you give us a little bit more background on that whole issue, please. <br />TERRY:Yes, I€d be happy to. There are a couple of questions in there. I€ll try and <br />meet them all. I want to also make it clear that Dr. Ron England who€s not here today, he€s in <br />Tahiti doing work from the Bishop Museum, is the one who did the pond work. He€s a specialist <br />in aquatic biology; and Ron could probably answer your questions a lot better. But this Ron, <br />Ron Terry, will attempt to do that. The differences in salinity probably are due to the fact that <br />the ponds aren€t directly connected, except at a really high tide, and the sediment at the bottom <br />as you observed. There€s a very large plug of sediment at the bottom. It was bigger before. The <br />ponds were cleaned out under an SMA permit, which I don€t know if it was mentioned in here. <br />It was obtained several years ago just to do that. And they took out a lot of vegetation; and from <br />what I understand many tons, over ten tons of garbage out of the ponds. And that obviously <br />influenced the biology, the water quality, the chemistry, the circulation. But the pond exhibits <br />are a very rapid response to the tides. It rises and falls with the tide. It€s basically fresh water, a <br />little bit of salinity; but it does move very quickly through the sides; and to some degree through <br />the bottom as well, especially where the sediment hasn€t plugged it up too badly. The plan for <br />restoration is to remove most of that sediment and make the water much clearer. Right now it <br />has got really only one fish, mosquito fish. And before, I understand, it had snapper. Our <br />aquatic biologist recommends that we use milk fish and mullet and not tilapia. And so the plan <br />will include those species. But it€s going to take a lot of work getting the sediment out and also <br />4EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />