My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-04-20 Leeward Exh A (Items 1 D&L Fujimoto PL-SMA-2023-000027)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-04-20 Leeward
>
D&L Fujimoto (PL-SMA-2023-000027)
>
2023-04-20 Leeward Exh A (Items 1 D&L Fujimoto PL-SMA-2023-000027)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2023 9:37:34 AM
Creation date
5/25/2023 9:37:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mind continues to go. So, what it is, as Commissioner Vitousek suggested, that we ask the <br /> Planning Department to work with the applicant to come up with some middle ground plan that <br /> addresses both needs that makes the most sense in terms of our role here as Commissioners. The <br /> question of sort of what kind of can of worms it opens, I think, is something we are not <br /> empowered to determine or equipped to determine. <br /> KERN: I will say, though, every action we take as a Commission sets a precedence and moves us <br /> forward in that direction <br /> KANUHA: Yeah <br /> KERN: there is a cumulative impact, the decisions that bodies like this make. That's yeah. <br /> DEFRANCO: Commissioner Vitousek. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you. No, and I think that this sets a good precedent for considering <br /> cumulative impacts within the SMA, because I feel like there are lots of small parcels in that area <br /> that have cumulatively impacted the coastal zone a lot bigger than, you know, one large <br /> development would have. So, to me, I think it's a good precedent that should be considered in <br /> future development within this area to create a proportional mitigation for the impact that's being <br /> created, and that, you know, requires work and planning from the Planning Department and <br /> figuring out what that proportional access and impact is going to be. But in the meantime, we <br /> trust you and your judgment to work out a good deal with that—at least I would. So, I think if, in <br /> the interest of moving forward, if I could, I'd like to make a motion. <br /> DEFRANCO: CJ, Commissioner Kanuha wants to say something, and then make a motion <br /> KANUHA: [Inaudible crosstalk] Mike finish up. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: Well, I'd just like to make a[inaudible crosstalk] <br /> FUKE: Madam Chair? <br /> DEFRANCO: Mr. Fuke. <br /> KANUHA: There is a motion on the floor. <br /> FUKE: Oh, there is a motion on yeah, okay. After hearing all of this dialogue and, you know, <br /> kind of talking to Mr. Fujimoto and, you know, hearing what Commissioner Knowles had to say <br /> about like, you know, how do you rope in the County so that they would be, indirectly, in a <br /> position to kind of help manage the situation, and I thought that was a very good point because, <br /> you know, if the Director or someone approves the plan, then, you know, you have greater <br /> culpability and, you know, if we call upon you guys to kind of help enforce them, you've got to <br /> 24 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.