My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-08 TDULLUM
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-07-08 TDULLUM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:22:28 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:22:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
than having the off-site storage tank, theyÓre proposing to have the on-site storage tanks with t <br />pump system bringing the water to the respective lots. And so this is, in a sense, a test <br />application that the Planning Director has been wanting to bring this matter to the attention of the <br />Commission and to the Council to be able to see if there are any possible options for allowing <br />change of zones in this particular situation with a private water system that doesnÓt meet the high <br />standards of Department of Water Supply. <br />Here are some site photos of the property. This is looking west on Mmalahoa. The actual <br />subject property is on the left side of the map. So this would be looking towards Honokaa. This <br />is looking towards Waimea. And, again, the subject property is on the right side of the map. <br />And then this is just an overview of the subject property. <br />The Planning DepartmentÓs recommendation is that the Planning Commission send a favorable <br />recommendation for this application. Are there any questions? <br />WOODWARD: Questions for staff? I have a question, and I probably will ask Mr. Fuke this. If <br />youÓre not going to go with the Department of WaterÓs standards, why go half way? Because the <br />point is theyÓre asking you to spend another $2.2 million for things that are ridiculous, to be <br />honest with you, and absolutely arbitrary in this sort of situation. Department of Water Supply <br />requires a redundant well. That has only been a requirement even for public systems in the last <br />four years. And the only reason they require it has nothing to do with water quality, safety, or <br />anything else. The reason they put that into effect was the Department of Water Supply in a <br />situation where they are responsible for supplying water doesnÓt want to have to truck in water if <br />thereÓs a failure of a well. Well, theyÓre already said theyÓre not going to be supplying water. <br />Why should they pay, thatÓs a very expensive insurance to have another well thatÓs sitting there <br />doing nothing. So why go half way if you canÓt meet the DepartmentÓs standards? They also <br />have a ridiculous, for a private situation like this, 100,000-gallon concrete tank I happen to know <br />cost $700,000 to $800,000. <br />The Department of Water SupplyÓs standards are what the Director says they are. ThereÓs no <br />more rationale to it than that, believe me. And the Department of Water Supply in this County is <br />the only one that mandates concrete tanks. Every other County, Kauai, Honolulu, Maui, all <br />accept glass-lined steel tanks. Also, you have to have malleable iron pipe. PVC is out. And all <br />of these things are crazy and have nothing to do with supplying five lots with water. <br />The other things, and there was an error in your things, Mr. Fuke. It says 42 gallons per minute <br />is 15,000 gallons a day. ItÓs not. ItÓs actually 60,480 gallons a day. YouÓve got what you need. <br />YouÓve already got what you need. So why go half way? YouÓre not going to meet the <br />Department of Water SupplyÓs standards. The redundant well doesnÓt have anything to do with <br />the safety standards from the Department of Health. So thatÓs my question, is why was there a <br />recommendation to go half way? <br />LEITHEAD TODD: This was in part because, you know, the applicant offered to try and build <br />something that they thought that they could afford which would take care of the number of lots. <br />But, you know, recognize that if you were trying to build it to, you know, 100,000 gallons and <br />the kind of stuff that the DWS would normally have, that thereÓs no way you can do it. And it <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.